The word-formation potential of affixes in the ancient Turkic runic texts


Views: 306 / PDF downloads: 351

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2022-3-118-127

Keywords:

runic inscriptions, language, root and functional morphemes, wordforming component, word-formation act, functions and meanings of word-formation morphemes, the old Turkic worldview

Abstract

In the era of the Old Turkic Khaganates, a full-fledged structure of the
Turkic word was formed in the runic language. Historical relics of the protoTurkic protoforms are still preserved in the root morphemes: primary roots,
verb-nominal syncretism, and sound-phonemic variability of roots. In the
language of runic monuments the corpus of service morphemes after the root
– the affixes – was quite well developed, so there was a quite well developed
system of morphology and derivation in the Proto-Turkic language. These
service morphemes can be functionally classified as formative and wordformative. The purpose of the article is to reveal the functions and meanings
of Old Turkic word-formation affixes.
The basic unit of affixal word-formation is a word forming component, in
which the formal semantic connection between the generating and derivative
stems is determined by semantic motivation. In the case of direct motivation,
the meaning of a derived word is formed from the meanings of the generating
word and the word-forming affix.
The affixes involved in word formation have a word-forming function, and
their word-forming meaning is determined by the system-forming function.
The author shows the diversity of word-formation meanings. The meanings
of old Turkic affixes survived in the modern Turkic languages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nurila Shaimerdinova, Eurasian National University named after L.N.Gumilyov

Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, Department of Turkology

Reference

Aidarov G., 1986. Kone turkі zhazba eskertkіshterіnіn tіlі [The language of ancient Turkic written monuments]. Аlmaty: Меktep. 182 p.

Amanzholov A.S., 1969. Glagol’niye upravlenie v yazike drevnetuyrkskih pamyatnikov [Verb control in the language of ancient Turkic monuments]. Мoscow: Nauka. 103 p.

Böhtlingk O., 1851. Die Sprache der Jakuten. St.-Pt. 167 p.Zaionchkovskij A. К., 1961. Voprosu o structure korniya v tuyrkskikh yazikakh. Glagol’niye osnovy monosillabicheskie (odnoslozhnie), tipa C+V [On the question of the structure of the root in the Turkic languages. Verbal stems are monosyllabic (monosyllabic), type C+V]. Voprosy yazikoznaniya [Questions of Linguistics]. No2. P. 28-35.

Zhanalina L.K., 1998. Sopostavitel’noye slovoobrazovanie russkogo I kazakhskogo yazykov [Comparative word formation of Russian and Kazakh languages]. Almaty: Republican publishing office of the Kazakh Academy of Education named after Y.Altynsarin. 153 p.

Zholdasbekov M., Sartkozhauly K., 2006. Atlas Orkhonskikh pamyatnikov (per. N. Shaimerdinovoi I dr.) [Atlas of the Orkhon Monuments (translated by N. Shaimerdinova and others)]. Astana: Kultegіn. 360 p.

Esipova A.V., 2011. Tyurkskie slovoobrazovanie kak yazikovaya sistema [Turkic word formation as a language system]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo SO RAN [Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 201 p.

Kerimov A.K., 2009. Slovoobraovatel’nye affiksy v yazike pamyatnikov tyurkoyazichnoi literaturry XIV veka (na material “Khosrov I Shirin” Kutba, “Gulistan” Seifa Sarai, “Muhabbat-name” Khorezmi) [Word-building affixes in the language of monuments of Turkic literature of the XIV century (Based on the material “Khosrov and Shirin” by Kutb, “Gulistan” by Seif Sarai, “Muhabbat-name” by Khorezmi)]. Almaty: Poligraphiya servis i К. 154 p.

Kononov A.N., 1980. Grammatika yazykia tyurkskih runicheskikh pis’mennykh pamyatnikov VII-IX vv. [Grammar of the language of the Turkic runic written monuments of the 7th-9th centuries]. Leningrad: Nauka. 255 p.

Kormushin I.V., 1997. Tyurkskie Eniseiskie epitafii [Turkic Yenisei epitaphs]. Teksty I issledovaniya [Texts and studies]. Moscow: Nauka. 303 p.

Kotvich V., 1962. Issledovanye po altayskim yazikam [Studies in Altaic languages]. Perevod s polskogo [Translation from Polish]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoi literatury. 367 p.

Melioranskij P.M., 1899. Pamyatnik v chest’ Kuyl-tegina [Monument in honor of Kul-tegin]. Saint-Petersburg: Tipografiya imperatorskoj Akademii nauk. 145 p.

Malov S.E., 1951. Pamyatniki drevnetyurkskoi pismennosti [Monuments of ancient Turkic writing]. Teksty I issledovaniya [Texts and studies]. Moscow-Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR. 455 p.

Oralbay N., 2002. Kazak tilinin sozzhasamy [Word formation of the Kazakh language]. Almaty, 192 p.

Radloff W., 1897. Die altturkischen Inschriften der Mongolei. Neue Folge. St.-Pb. 296 p.

Sevortyan E.V., 1974. Etimologicheskii slovar’ tuyrkskikh yazikov (obshetuyrkskie I mezhtuyrkskie osnovi na glasnie) [Etymological Dictionary of Turkic Languages (Common Turkic and Inter-Turkic stems into vowels)]. Moscow: Nauka. 754 p.

Shaimerdinova N. G., Sandybaeva A., 2015. Kop magynaly sozderding semnatikalyk kurylymy [Semantic structure of ambiguous words]. «Kazak leksikografiyasy tarihy, tazhiribesi, bolashagy» Khalykaralyk gylymi-teoriyalyk konferentsia materialdary [«History, practice, future of Kazakh lexicography» Proceedings of the international scientific-theoretical conference]. Аlmaty: Еltanim. P. 289 -292.

Shaimerdinova N., 2022. Kornevaya morpheme v drevnetuyrkskom yazike [A root morpheme in the Old Turkic language] Turkic Studies Journal. 1 Vol.1 (4) P. 95-108. DOI: http:// doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2022-1-95-108.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-20

How to Cite

Shaimerdinova, N. (2022). The word-formation potential of affixes in the ancient Turkic runic texts. Turkic Studies Journal, 4(3), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2022-3-118-127