A root morpheme in the Old Turkic language
Views: 397 / PDF downloads: 580
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2022-1-95-108Keywords:
old Turkic literary language, language system, word structure, root morpheme, symbolism, historical relics, non-derivatives, variability, producing root morphemesAbstract
The old Turkic literary language was formed on the basis of ancient Turkic dialects. In the
era of the ancient Turkic kaganates, the language of runic inscriptions as a single literary language was
used by various Turkic tribes or unions of tribes – Kipchaks, Oghuz, Uighurs, Turgesh, Kirghiz. The internal
structure of the old Turkic literary language has been sufficiently studied in terms of graphic, phoneticphonological,
lexical, morphological. However, the morpheme-derivative system of the language has been
studied fragmentarily and inconsistently. The purpose of this article is to consider the structure of the
old Turkic word, in particular, the potential of the root morpheme. The structure of the old Turkic word
consists of a root and affixal morphemes, differentiated into derivational, inflectional and formative. A root
morpheme is a sign unit, the content of which is encoded information embodied in the lexical meaning of
the word. The meaning of the root is singular and concrete, in contrast to the abstract meanings of auxiliary
morphemes. The root morpheme of the old Turkic language differs from the root morphemes of modern
Turkic languages in a number of ways, and above all in the preservation of historical relics, primary
monosyllabic and verb-nominal syncretism. In the process of the historical development of the structure
of the Turkic word on the basis of monosyllabic, a new model of the root appears, along with which
many types of non-derivative roots, three/four/five/six-syllable/seven-syllabic, function in the old Turkic
language, which reveals the potential of non-derivative Turkic roots. Another feature of the old Turkic root
is the variability of its sound-phonemic composition ((ил/ел; ир/эр/ ер; бен/мен, сен/син, ол/ул/у;
мын/мин/мен/мун/мүн) il/el; ir/er/er; ben/men, sen/sin, ol/ul/u; myn/min/men/mun/mun), which is
uncharacteristic for root morphemes of modern Turkic languages. Such diffuse changes are fundamentally
due to the archaism of the proto-forms and the influence of ancient Turkic dialects.
The root morpheme is the old Turkic language is an active participant in the act of word creation,
representing a generating basis in the formation of derivative words with word-building affixes. The
derivation of the root morpheme is also revealed in the formation of complex, paired words and combinations
of words, typologically inherent in the Turkic languages both in diachrony and in synchrony.
The root of the old Turkic word structure is the subject of a required article by the author.
Downloads
Reference
Tenishev E.R. Izbrannye trudy. E.R.Tenishev. Kniga pervaya [Selected works. E.R. Tenishev. The first book]. Ufa, Gilem, 2006. 304 p. [in Russian].
Sevortyan E.V. Etimologicheskij slovar’ tyurkskih yazykov (obshchetyurkskie i mezhtyurkskie osnovy na glasnye) [Etymological Dictionary of Turkic Languages (Common Turkic and Inter-Turkic stem into vowels]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo «Nauka», 1974. 754 p. [in Russian].
Kotvich V. Issledovaniya po altajskim yazykam. Perevod s pol’skogo [Studies in Altaic languages. Translation from Polish]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo «Inostrannoj literatury», 1962. 367 p. [in Russian].
Zaionchkovskij A. K voprosu o strukture kornya v tyurkskih yazykah. Glagol’nye osnovy monosillabicheskie (odnoslozhnye), tipa C+V [On the question of the structure of the root in the Turkic languages. Verbal stems are monosyllabic (monosyllabic), type C+V]. In: Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of Linguistics]. 1961. No2. P. 28-35. [in Russian].
Baskakov N.A. Vvedenie v izuchenie tyurkskih yazykov. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop [Introduction to the study of Turkic languages. Ed. 2nd, correc. and supplem.]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1969. 384 p. [in Russian].
Yunusaliev B.M. Kirgizskaya leksikologiya. Ch.1. Razvitie kornevyh slov [Kyrgyz lexicology. Part 1. The development of root words]. Frunze, Nauka, 1959. 178 p. [in Russian].
Kononov A.N. Grammatika yazyka tyurkskih runicheskih pis’mennyh pamyatnikov VII-IX vv. [Grammar of the language of the Turkic runic written monuments of the 7th-9th centuries]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1980. 255 p. [in Russian].
Hasenova A.K. Glagol’nye osnovy kazahskogo yazyka. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora filologicheskih nauk [Verb bases of the Kazakh language. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology]. Alma-Ata, 1988. 69 p. [in Russian].
Ibatov A.M. Morfemnaya struktura kazahskogo slova. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora filologicheskih nauk [Morphemic structure of the Kazakh word. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology]. Alma-Ata, 1988. 56 p. [in Russian].
Mankeeva Zh.A. Rekonstrukciya pervichnyh kornej glagol’nyh osnov kazahskogo yazyka [Reconstruction of the primary roots of the verbal stems of the Kazakh language]. Alma-Ata, «Gylym», 1991. 154 p. [in Russian].
Kazhibekov E. Semantika tyurkskogo slova. Problemy mezhurovnevoj sopryazhyonnosti. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni doktora filologicheskih nauk [Semantics of the Turkic word. Problems of interlevel conjugacy. Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philology]. Alma-Ata, 1988. 64 p. [in Russian].
Ogden C., Richards I. The Meaning of Meaning. Philosophical Review. N.Y., 1927. 396 p.
Laionz Dzh. Vvedenie v teoreticheskuyu lingvistiku [Introduction to theoretical linguistics]. Moscow, Progress, 1977. 235 p. [in Russian].
Ufimceva A.A. Tipy slovesnyh znakov. Izd. 2-e stereotipnoe [Types of word marks. Ed. 2nd stereotypical]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004. 208 p. [in Russian].
Apresyan Yu.D. Izbrannye trudy. T.I. Leksicheskaya semantika. 2-e izd [Selected works. T.I. Lexical semantics. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, Shkola «Yazyki russkoj kul’tury», 1995. 472 p. [in Russian].
Kobozeva I.M. Lingvisticheskaya semantika [Linguistic semantics]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2000. 352 p. [in Russian].
Zhanalina L.K. Sopostavitel’noe slovoobrazovanie russkogo i kazahskogo yazykov [Comparative word formation of Russian and Kazakh languages]. Almaty, 1998. 152 p. [in Russian].
Ramstedt G. Vvedenie v altajskoe yazykoznanie. Morfologiya. per s nem. [Introduction to Altai linguistics. Morphology. Transl. from Germ.]. Moscow, 1957. 233 p. [in Russian].
Batmanov I.A. Yazyk enisejskih pamyatnikov drevnetyurkskoj pis’mennosti [The language of the Yenisei monuments of ancient Turkic writing]. Frunze, Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk Kirgizskoj SSR, 1959. 218 p. [in Russian].
Melioranskij P.M. Pamyatnik v chest’ Kyul’-tegina [Monument in honor of Kul-tegin]. Sain-Petersburg, Tipografiya imperatorskoj Akademii nauk, 1899. 145 p. [in Russian].
Shaimerdinova N.G. «Kirgizsko-russkij slovar’» (1897): kul’turnye i yazykovye eksplikacii [«Kyrgyz-Russian Dictionary» (1897): cultural and linguistic explications]. In: Turkic Studies Jornal. Vol.1 No 1 2019. Nur-Sultan, 2019. P. 73-88. [in Russian].
Malov S.E. Pamyatniki drevnetyurkskoj pis’mennosti. Teksty i issledovaniya [Monuments of ancient Turkic writing. Texts and studies]. Moscow-Leningrad, Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 1951. 455 p. [in Russian].
Shaimerdinova N.G. Kognitivnaya semantika drevnetyurkskih Orhonskih tekstov [Cognitive semantics of ancient Turkic Orkhon texts]. Astana, ENU, 2007. 248 p. [in Russian].
Zholdasbekov M., Sartkozhauly K. Atlas Orhonskih pammyatnikov (per. N. Shaimerdinovoj i dr.) [Atlas of the Orkhon Monuments (translated by N. Shaimerdinova and others)]. Astana, Kultegіn, 2006. 360 p. [in Russian].
Aidarov G. Kone turkі zhazba eskertkіshterіnіn tіlі [The language of ancient Turkic written monuments]. Almaty, «Mektep», 1986. 182 p. [in Kazakh].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Turkic Studies Journals

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



















