Semantic and grammatical connections of the Old Turkic word аčïγ with the vocabulary of the Kazakh language


Views: 71 / PDF downloads: 24

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2025-2-197-212

Keywords:

ancient Turkic word, semantic structure, аčïγ, ащы, syncretism, affix, lexicalsemantic variant, polysemantic word, Kazakh vocabulary, verbal word.

Abstract

The article examines the semantic connections of the Old Turkic word аčïγ, which is part of the main lexical fund of the language, with the words of the Kazakh language, genealogically ascending to the Old Turkic word. The lexeme ačïγ denotes a basic taste and is derived from the verb ačï- following a word-formation pattern with the suffix -g, which forms deverbal nouns. The reconstruction of the semantic structure of the polysemous Old Turkic word enables to conclude that it is largely preserved in the modern Turkic languages. This is confirmed by data from Kazakh language dictionaries. The analysis of the semantic structure of the word ačïγ, its comparison with the semantics of the verbal root from which it is derived in Old Turkic, as well as with the semantic structure of the lexeme ащы in Kazakh, has made it possible to identify a number of trends in the development of lexical and grammatical connections between polysemous words in Old Turkic and Kazakh. These include the expansion of direct meanings, the divergence of lexical-semantic variants of the polysemous Old Turkic word, and the emergence of homonyms in the modern Turkic language, such as Kazakh. A simplification of the semantic structure of lexemes etymologically related to the Old Turkic word is also observed, due to the aforementioned process of divergence in lexical-semantic variants, along with the simultaneous emergence of new meanings. An important role in the semantic development of the word ащы in the Kazakh language was played by the syncretism of Old Turkic deverbal words, which led to the differentiation of meanings between adjectives and nouns that were originally part of a single semantic structure of the Old Turkic lexeme. The analysis of the semantic structure of Old Turkic lexemes, as demonstrated by our study, reveals hidden and lost semantic connections in Kazakh words and reconstructs the logic behind the development of their meanings.

Information about author

Zifa Temirgazina, A. Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University

Doctor of Philology, Professor

Olga Andryuchshenko, Alkey Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor

Reference

Ал-Кашгари Махмуд, 2005. Диван Лугат ат-Турк. Перевод, предисловие и комментарии З.-А.М. Ауэзовой, индексы составлены Р. Эрмерсом. Алматы: Дайк-Пресс. 1288 с.

Древнетюркский словарь, 2016. Под ред. Д.М. Насилова, И.В. Кормушина, А.В. Дыбо, У.К. Исабековой; сост. Т.А. Боровкова, Л.В. Дмитриева, А.А. Зырин, И.В. Кормушин и др. 2-е изд., пересмотр. Астана: «Ғылым» баспасы. 760 с.

Жамолова Ш.Ш., 2021. Cемантическая структура слова. Экономика и социум. №10(89). С. 647-650.

Каиржанов А.К., Азмуханова А.М., Абжапарова Б.Д., 2024. Синкретизм общественного мифологического сознания древнейшей эпохи. Тіл және әдебиет: теориясы мен тәжірибесі. №1. С.9-19. http://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-23-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-23-33

Қазақша-орысша сөздік. [Электронный ресурс] – URL: https://sozdik.kz/(дата обращения: 12.01.2025)

Қалиев Б., 2014. Қазақ тілінің түсіндірме сөздігі. Алматы: Мемлекеттік тілді дамыту институты. 726 б.

Рамстедт Г.И., 1957. Введение в алтайское языкознание. Москва: Изд. Иностранная литература. 254 с.

Сарбалаев Ж.Т., 2014. Из истории имени прилагательного в казахском языке. Мир науки, культуры, образования. № 4 (47). С. 252-255.

Севортян Э.В., 1966. Аффиксы именного словообразования в азербайджанском языке. Москва: Наука. 437 с.

Сөздік. Словарь, 2002. Составители: Б. Исмағұлова, Э. Ережепова, Г. Әбдижапбарова. Алматы: Издательство «Аруна». 416 б.

Тектигул Ж.О., 2013. Эволюция общетюркских аффиксов в казахском языке. Москва: Академия естествознания. 277 с. [Электронный ресурс] – URL: https://monographies.ru/ru/book/section?id=6673 (дата обращения: 10.02.2025)

Темиргазина З.К., 2024. Батыр в казахском эпосе как архетип героя: концепции А. Маргулана и современных исследователей. Тіл және әдебиет: теориясы мен тәжірибесі. Язык и литература: теория и практика. №1. С. 20-27. http://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-49-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-49-56

Темиргазина З.К., Андрющенко О.К., Амангелды А., 2024. Глаголы с семантикой ремесленных действий в словаре Махмуда ал-Кашгари как отражение хозяйственной и социальной жизни древних тюрков. Turkic Studies Journal. Т. 6. № 4. С. 150-167. http://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2024-4-150-167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2024-4-150-167

Erdal M., 2004. A grammar of Old Turkic. Lejden: Brill. 575 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047403968

Gries S., 2019. Chapter 2: Polysemy. In: Cognitive Linguistics – Key Topics. P. 22-43. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110626438-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110626438-002

Klein D.E. and Murphy G.L., 2001. The Representation of Polysemous Words. Journal of Memory and Language. No. 45. P. 259-282. http://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2779

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

Temirgazina, Z., & Andryuchshenko, O. (2025). Semantic and grammatical connections of the Old Turkic word аčïγ with the vocabulary of the Kazakh language. Turkic Studies Journal, 7(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2025-2-197-212

Issue

Section

Turkic languages