Desemantization of the Old Turkic khan, baj, beg in the modern Kazakh anthroponyms


Views: 388 / PDF downloads: 283

Authors

  • Zifa Temirgazina Alkey Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University
  • Olga Andryushchenko Alkey Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2023-1-131-144

Keywords:

ancient Turkic elements, khan, bek, bai, anthroponym, composite, affixoid, desemantisation

Abstract

The lexemes khan, bai, bek of Old Turkic origin are frequent components in modern Kazakh masculine name compounds such as Abilkhan, Adilbek, Kumisbay, etc. During centuries of development with the aforementioned Old Turkic common words denoting a person’s high social, class and material status in Kazakh society, various semantic changes took place. Of particular interest to us
are the processes that take place in their semantics when they function as part of the complex masculine name composites. The most important factor that has influenced the dynamics of semantic processes in these words is an extra-linguistic factor: a change in the socio-economic structure of Kazakh society that led to the loss of statuses, titles and ranks. As a result, the old Turkish nouns became historicisms, which lost their referential and thus also part of their denotative meaning. The second, purely linguistic
factor was the semantic-grammatical nature of the first component of the compound name, which also significantly determined the processes in the semantics of the Old Turkic elements. Thus, in the complex two-part names with the first component – the name of a person according to a certain parameter – there is an additional desemanticisation of the Old Turkic elements due to the semantic redundancy (the repetition of the sem «person»), for example: Zholdaskhan, Dosbay. In combination with the animal names, these elements actualise the semes ‘man’, ‘baby’, ‘male’, having an identifying rather than a nominative function and therefore becoming a unit of the transitional type affixoid. In combination with the toponyms, numerals and adjectives, the old Turkic elements are desemanticised, undergo the process of affixoidisation and now function as signs for the name of a male person. The desemanticisation of the listed Old Turkic elements contributed to their preservation in the active fundus of the Kazakh language in a new, identifying function as part of complex anthroponyms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Information about author

Zifa Temirgazina, Alkey Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University

Doctor of Philology, Professor

Olga Andryushchenko, Alkey Margulan Pavlodar Pedagogical University

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor

Reference

Gak V.G., 2003. Predely semanticheskoy evolyutsii slov [Limits of the semantic evolution of words]. Russkiy yazyk segodnya [Russian language today]. Pod red. L. P. Krysina. Moscow. Vyp. 2. P. 88-97. [in Russian].

DTS – Drevnetyurkskiy slovar’, 2016. [Ancient Turkic Dictionary]. Pod red. D.M. Nasilova, I.V. Kormushina i dr.; 2-ye izd., peresmotr. Astana: «Ġylym» baspasy. 760 p. [in Russian].

Esipova A.V., 2011. Tyurkskie slovoobrazovanie kak yazikovaya sistema [Turkic word formation as a language system]. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo SO RAN [Publishing House of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 201 p. [in Russian].

Zhanuzakov T.D., 1976. Osnovnye problemy onomastiki kazakhskogo yazyka [The main problems of onomastics of the Kazakh language]: Avtoref. dis...dокт. filol. nauk. Alma-Ata. 129 p. [in Russian].

Zhanuzakov T.D., 1989. Esimіnіz kіm? [Your name?]. Almaty: Kazakhstan. 192 p. [in Kazakh].

Zhubanov H., 1966. Issledovaniya po kazakhskomu yazyku. [Studies in the Kazakh language]. Alma-Ata. 361 p. [in Russian].

Karaulov Yu.N., 2008. Russkiy yazyk: Entsiklopediya. [Russian language: Encyclopedia]. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].

Kubryakova Ye.S., 1978. Chasti rechi v onomasiologicheskom osveshchenii. [Parts of speech in onomasiological coverage]. Moscow: Nauka. 115 p. [in Russian].

Makhmudov H.H., 1988. Kratkiy ocherk grammatiki kazakhskogo yazyka. [Brief essay on the grammar of the Kazakh language]. Kazakhsko-russkiy slovar’. [Kazakh-Russian Dictionary]. Alma-Ata: Glavnaya redaktsiya Kazakhskoy sovetskoy entsiklopedii. P. 409-463. [in Russian].

Nikonov V.A., 1988. Geografiya familiy. [Family geography]. Moscow: Nauka. 192 p. [in Russian].

Nurmagambetov A., 1990. Etimologiya nekotorykh prilagatel’nykh, obrazovannykh pri pomoshchi pokazatelya -day [Etymology of some adjectives formed with the indicator -dai]. Problemy etimologii tyurkskikh yazykov. [Problems of the etymology of Turkic languages]. Alma-Ata: Ġylym. P. 205-211. [in Russian].

Oralbay N., 2002. Kazak tilinin sozzhasamy [Word formation of the Kazakh language]. Almaty, 192 p. [in Kazakh].

Rakhimova A.R., 2013. Affiksal’nyy sposob obrazovaniya tyurkskikh leksem, kharakterizuyushchikh cheloveka. [Affixal Method of Formation of Turkic Lexemes Describing a Person]. Uchenyye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. T. 155, kn. 5. Gumanitarnyye nauki. P. 152-165. [in Russian].

Rozental’ D. E., Telenkova M. A., 1985. Slovar’-spravochnik lingvisticheskikh terminov. [Dictionary-reference book of linguistic terms]. 3-ye izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow, 400 p. [in Russian].

Suragan A., Yergaliev K., 2022. San negizdi etnografizmderdin semantikalyk erekshelegi. [Semantic features of number-based ethnographisms]. Yazyk i literatura: teoriya i praktika [Language and literature: theory and practice]. No1. P. 8-18. [in Kazakh].

Sutzhanov S., 2022. Alash zhane Akhmet [Alash and Ahmet]. Yazyk i literatura: teoriya i praktika [Language and literature: theory and practice]. No 2. P. 85-88. [in Kazakh].

Temerbayeva A.M., 2013. Morfologicheskiy sposob obrazovaniya ekspressivno-stilisticheskikh znacheniy antroponimov (na materiale russkogo, kazakhskogo i turetskogo yazykov). [Morphological method of expressive and stylistic meanings of anthroponyms formation on the example of Russian, Kazakh and Turkish languages]. KazNU Bulletin. Oriental series. No2(63). Р. 106-109. [in Russian].

Husnutdinov D.H., Sagdieva R.K., 2018. Slovoobrazovanie tatarskikh im’on [The Word-formation of the tatar Names]. Turkic onomastics: from the origins to the present time: Materials of International Research and Practice Conference. G.R. Galiullina (ed.). Kazan: Publishing House of the Kazan University. 334 p. [in Russian].

Shaimerdinova N., 2022б. Kornevaya morpheme v drevnetuyrkskom yazike [A root morpheme in the Old Turkic language]. Turkic Studies Journal. 1 Vol. 1 (4). P. 95-108. DOI: http:// doi. org/10.32523/2664-5157-2022-1-95-108 [in Russian].

Shanskiy N.M., 1968. Ocherki po russkomu slovoobrazovaniyu. [Essays on Russian word formation]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta. 312 p. [in Russian].

Shaimerdinova N.G., 2022а. The word-formation potential of affixes in the ancient Turkic runic texts. Turkic Studies Journal. Vol. 4. No 3. P. 118-127. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2022-3-118-127.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Temirgazina З., & Andryushchenko О. (2023). Desemantization of the Old Turkic khan, baj, beg in the modern Kazakh anthroponyms. Turkic Studies Journal, 5(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2023-1-131-144

Issue

Section

Turkic languages