The lexeme «road» and road toponyms in Kazakh culture and language


Views: 317 / PDF downloads: 258

Authors

  • Bekzhan Abdualiuly Л.Н.Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университеті

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2024-2-155-173

Keywords:

semantic analysis, drononyms, road toponyms, Silk Road, conceptual aspect, geographical, historical and cultural, worldview, ambiguity, syntagmatic combinations of lexemes

Abstract

The article provides a semantic analysis of lexemes-drononyms and road toponyms that reflect the territory of Kazakhstan, including its vast steppes, forests, arid deserts, mountain ranges, rivers, and lakes. Roads require the determination of effective routes, ensuring people’s safety, and providing them with food and accommodation. The concept of a road is closely linked to the geography, economy, traditions, and spiritual beliefs of the Kazakh people.
The spatial and temporal meanings of drononyms are influenced by the historical nomadic lifestyle of the Kazakhs and their seasonal migrations. The article analyzes vocabulary related to walking, horseback riding, and nomadic movements associated with the historical lifestyle of the Kazakhs.
A significant focus of the article is the definition of road toponyms, particularly highlighting the trade, political, and cultural importance of the Silk Road, which passed through the territory of Kazakhstan.
Based on the research of Kazakh scientist A. Margulan and other scholars, the interpretations of numerous road toponyms of the country are systematized.
During the analysis of drononyms and toponyms, their conceptual meanings (geographical, historical and cultural, ideological) are revealed. The ambiguity of lexemes, their derivative potential, and syntagmatic combinations are explored, which enabled the author to conduct a systematic semantic analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bekzhan Abdualiuly, Л.Н.Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университеті

Doctor of Philology, Acting Professor

Reference

Äbduäliūly B., 2021. Qazaq toponımıkasy [Kazakh toponymy]. Nūr-Sūltan: Bulatov A.J. 321 p. [in Kazakh].

Aitkali A.K., Karazhigitova A., 2023. On the issue of studying the connection of the ancient people of the Upper Irtysh region and Zhetysu at the end of the 1stmillennium BG. Turkic Studies Journal. Volume 5. Number 2. P. 23-32.

Basik S.N., 2008. Obshaıa toponımıka: ýchebnoe posobıe dlá stýdentov geogr. Fak. [General toponymy: a textbook for students of the Faculty of Geography]. Minsk: BGU. 168 p. [in Russian].

Biıarov B., 2012. Jer-sý attarynyń sózjasamdyq úlgileri [Word - formation patterns of toponyms]. Almaty: Memlekettık tıldı damytu instituty. 460 p. [in Kazakh].

Bolğanbaiūly Ä., 1997. Qalıuly Ǵ Qazirgi qazaq tiliniń leksıkologıasy men frazeologıasy [Qaliūly Ğ. Lexicology and phraseology of the modern Kazakh language]. Almaty: Sanat. 256 b.Hasenov Ä., 2003. Til bilimi (oqý quraly) [Linguistics (study guide)]. Almaty: Sanat. 416 p. [in Kazakh].

Iris Colditz, 2020. Buddhist and Indian Elements in the Onomastics of the Iranian Manichaean Texts. Entangled Religions. V. 11. No6. URL: https://er.ceres.rub.de/index.php/ER/article/view/8710 (14.04.2024).

Jūbanov Q., 2013. Qazaq til biliminiń máseleleri [Questions of Kazakh linguistics]. Almaty: Abzal-Ai. 640 p. [in Kazakh].

Katarina Lozić Knezović, Marina Marasović-Alujević, 2017. Transonymization as Revitalization: Old Toponyms of Split. Voprosy onomastiki. Volume 14. Issue 2. P. 159-173.

Kolomiets V.T., 1984. Nazvanıa dorog v ındoevropeıskıh ıazykah [Road names in Indo-European languages. Collection: Etymology. Moscow: Nauka. 255 p. [in Russian].

Kurkina L.V., 1968. Iz nablúdenıı nad nekotorymı nazvanıamı dorog ı tropınok v slavánskıh ıazykah [From observations on some names of roads and paths in Slavic languages]. Collection: Etymology. Moscow: Nauka. 278 p. [in Russian].

Margulan A.H., 2012. Shyǵarmalary. XIII tom [Collected works. Volume XIII]. Almaty: Alatau. 576 p. [in Kazakh].Nūğman B.Ğ., Şaimūqanova S.D., 2020. Uly Jibek joly [The Great Silk Road]. URL: https://ulagat.com/2020/11/16/ūly-jıbek-joly/ 14.04.2024 j.

Podolskaıa N.V., 1988. Slovar rýsskoı onomastıcheskoı termınologıı [Dictionary of Russian onomastic terminology]. Moscow: Nauka. 192 p. [in Russian].

Saparov Q., 2007. Pavlodar oblysynyń toponımıkalyq keńistigi (qazaqtardyń keńistikti ıgerý tájirıbesiniń jer-sý ataýlaryndaǵy kórinisi) [Toponymic space of Pavlodar region (reflection of the experience of spatial development of Kazakhs in the names of land-waters)]. Pavlodar: «KO» ĞÖF. 308 p. [in Kazakh].

Vasilyev V.L., 2023. New look on the toponyms Valdai and Gora-Valdai. Voprosy onomastiki. V.20. No 2. P. 41-57. URL: http://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/123672 (14.04.2024).Zhumagulov Zh. Qandaı jol ataýlaryn bilesiz? [What road names do you know?]. URL: https://massaget.kz/layfstayl/zhadnama/48279/ (14.04.2024). [in Kazakh].

Downloads

Published

2024-06-15

How to Cite

Abdualiuly Б. (2024). The lexeme «road» and road toponyms in Kazakh culture and language. Turkic Studies Journal, 6(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2024-2-155-173

Issue

Section

Culture and Art of the Kazakhs