The leading ornamental motif koshkar muyiz in Kazakh ornamentation: in search of the primordi


Қаралымдар: 380 / PDF жүктеулері: 151

Авторлар

  • Sergali Suraganov S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2021-2-99-110

Кілт сөздер:

ornamental motif, pattern, Koshkar Muyiz, Kazakhs, Kazakhstan, artistic felt

Аннотация

The ornamental motif of Koshkar Muyiz – the legacy of the Ancient times – remains
key in the traditional art of felt craft.
The horn-shaped figures of the Kazakhs had been a centerpiece of scholarly discourses of Kazakh,
Russian and Soviet science over the entire 20th century. The first attempts to find their meaning were
made by the German ethnologist R. Karutz (1911), the Russian researchers S. Dudin (1928), B. Kuftin
(1926), E. Schneider (1927), and others. The horn-shaped motif had been reviewed in the works of
archaeologists, art historians and ethnographers since the second half of the 20th century. Scientists
determined the time of its origin, its geography, and attempted to translate its semantic content. It was
found that the curvilinear motif had not appeared earlier than the New Stone Age, but in the Bronze
Age, it had developed in the form of various styled designs. This motif obviously played a key role in
the ornamental complex of the Turkic-Mongol peoples.
Based on the interdisciplinary approach, the author offers a number of reasons to explain its
viability, including the internal form of the word - name of the ornamental motif, which is epic in
nature since it can cause a special aesthetic reaction in viewers. The ornamental motif seems to play
the role of a “figure of memories” and have the status of a “substantiative past”. It is preserved as a
linguistic objectification (name) in an extra-linguistic format as well, in the form of an Iconic Model
of a transcultural anagram that reproduces the ancient ideological content with symbolic and magical
scope. Acting as a canon, the Koshkar Muyiz motif is a sort of a “Signature of the Era” with its artistic
charm and is constructively based on the line called the “Line of Beauty” by William Hogarth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Автор өмірбаяны

Sergali Suraganov, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical University

Senior Lecturer of Department of Design

Әдебиет

Ivanov S.B. Ornament narodov Sibiri kak istoricheskiy istochnik (po materialam ХIХ – nachala ХХ v.). Narody Severa i Dal’nego Vostoka. [Ornament of the peoples of Siberia as a historical source (based on materials from the 19th - early 20th centuries)]. Peoples of the North and the Far East. (Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1963, 506 p.) [in Russian].

Ibrayeva K.T. Ornament memorial’nykh pamyatnikov kazakhov (na materiale nekropoley Mangyshlaka): avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchenoy stepeni kandidata iskusstvovedeniya [Ornament of memorial monuments of Kazakhs (based on the material of the necropolises of Mangyshlak). Abstract for the degree of candidate of art history]. Protected: 27/03/1985. Moscow, 1985. 26 p. [in Russian].

Dudin S.M. Kirgizskiy ornament [Kyrgyz ornament]. Vostok. In: Zhurnal literatury, nauki i iskusstva [Kyrgyz ornament // East. Journal of Literature, Science and Art.]. 5 (1925), P. 164–183. [in Russian].

Kuftin B.A. Kirgiz-kazaki. Kul’tura i byt [Kyrghyz Cossacks. Culture and life]. Moscow, Tsentr. muzey narodovedeniya, 1926. 48 p. [in Russian].

Smağululı O. Qazaqtardıñ étnïkalıq tarïxındağı metodologïyalıq mäseleler [Methodological issues in the ethnic history of Kazakhs]. In: Izvestiya Natsional’noy akademii nauk Respubliki Kazakhstan. Seriya obshchestvennykh nauk [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Social Science Series]. 1 (193), 65–72 (1994). [in Kazakh].

Kubarev V.D., Tseveendorzh D., Yakobson E. Petroglify Tsagaan-Salaa i Baga-Oygura (Mongol’skiy Altay) [Petroglyphs of Tsagaan-Salaa and Baga-Oigura (Mongolian Altai)]. (Izd-vo Instituta arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 2005. 640 p.). [in Russian].

Vainshtein S.I. Istoriya narodnogo iskusstva Tuvy [History of folk art of Tuva]. (Nauka, Moscow, 1974, 224 p.). [in Russian].

Makhova Ye.I., Cherkasova N.V. Ornamentirovannyye izdeliya iz voyloka [Ornamented products made of felt]. Narodnoye dekorativno-prikladnoye iskusstvo kirgizov [Folk decorative and applied art of the Kyrgyz]. In: Trudy Kirgizskoy arkheologo-etnograficheskoy ekspeditsii [Proceedings of the Kyrgyz archaeological and ethnographic expedition]. V. 13-31 (1969). [in Russian].

Khoroshikh P.P. Materialy po ornamentu ol’khonskikh buryat [Materials on the ornament of the Olkhon Buryats]. II (VI), 211–214 (1926). [in Russian].

Petri B.E. Ornament kudinskikh buryat [Ornament of the Kudin Buryats], Sboornik Muzeya antropologii i etnografii pri Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography at the Russian Academy of Sciences]. (tip. Ross. akad. nauk, Petrograd, 1918, t. 5, vyp. 1, P. 215-252). [in Russian].

Vygotskiy L.S. Psikhologiya iskusstva [Psychology of art]. (Iskusstvo, Moscow, 1986, 573 p.). [in Russian].

Baypakov K.M. Kul’t barana u syrdar’inskikh plemen [The cult of the ram among the Syrdarya tribes] Arkheologicheskiye issledovaniya drevnego i srednevekovogo Kazakhstana [Archaeological studies of ancient and medieval Kazakhstan]. («Science» of the Kazakh SSR, Alma-Ata, 1980. P. 32–45). [in Russian].

Badmayev A.A. Remesla aginskikh buryat (k probleme etnokul’turnykh kontaktov) [Crafts of the Agin Buryats (to the problem of ethnocultural contacts)]. (IAET SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 1997, 160 p.).

Kuzeyeva Z.Z., Murtazayev A.O., Shaushev K.B. K probleme genezisa nogayskogo narodnogo ornamenta [To the problem of the genesis of the Nogai folk ornament], Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. 6 (2014) [Electronic resource]. Available at: www.science-education.ru/120-16789 URL: (Accessed: 13.04.2015). [in Russian].

Shneyder Ye.R. Kazakhskaya ornamentika [Kazakh ornamentation] Kazaki. Atropologicheskiye ocherki [Cossacks. Atropological essays]. (Acad. of Sciences of the USSR, Leningrad, 1927. P. 135-171). [in Russian].

Smagulov Ye.A. Paleosemantika tsentral’noy kompozitsii kazakhskogo ornamenta [Paleosemantics of the central composition of the Kazakh ornament]. In: Izvestiya NAN RK. Seriya obshchestvennykh nauk [Izvestiya NAS RK. Social Science Series.]. 5, 82–91, (1994). [in Russian].

Sher Ya.A. Petroglify Sredney i Tsentral’noy Azii [Petroglyphs of Central Asia]. (Nauka, Moscow, 1980, 328 p.). [in Russian].

Litvinskiy B.A. Kangyuysko-sarmatskiy farn (k istoriko-kul’turnym svyazyam plemen Yuzhnoy Rossii i Sredney Azii) [Kangyui-Sarmatian Farn (to the historical and cultural ties of the tribes of Southern Russia and Central Asia)]. (Izd-vo «Donish», Dushanbe, 1968, 120 p.). [in Russian].

Margulan A.Kh. Kazakhskoye narodnoye prikladnoye iskusstvo [Kazakh folk applied art]. T. 1. (Oner, Alma-Ata, 1986, 256 p.). [in Russian].

Kovtun I.V. Izobrazitel’nyye traditsii epokhi bronzy Tsentral’noy i Severo-Zapadnoy Azii: problemy genezisa i khronologii ikonograficheskikh kompleksov severo-zapadnogo Sayano-Altaya [Fine traditions of the Bronze Age in Central and North-West Asia: problems of the genesis and chronology of iconographic complexes of the North-West Sayan-Altai]. (Izd-vo Instituta arkheologii i etnografii SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 2001, 184 p.). [in Russian].

Potebnya A.A. Teoreticheskaya poetika [Theoretical poetics]. (Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, 1990, 344 p.). [in Russian].

Argynbayev Kh. Narodnyye obychai i pover’ya kazakhov, svyazannyye so skotovodstvom [Folk customs and beliefs of Kazakhs associated with cattle breeding], Khozyaystvenno-kul’turnyye traditsii narodov Sredney Azii i Kazakhstana [Economic and cultural traditions of the peoples of Central Asia and Kazakhstan]. (Nauka, Moscow, 1975. P. 194–205). [in Russian].

Anokhin A.V. Materialy po shamanstvu u altaytsev, sobrannyye vo vremya puteshestviy po Altayu 1910–1912 gg. po porucheniyu Russkogo komiteta dlya izucheniya Sredney i Vostochnoy Azii [Materials on shamanism among the Altaians, collected during travels in Altai in 1910–1912. on behalf of the Russian Committee for the Study of Central and East Asia]. (Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography T. IV, Vyp. 2, Leningrad, 1924, 248 p.). [in Russian].

Frezer Dzh. Dzh. Zolotaya vetv’: Issledovaniye magii i religii [The Golden Branch: A Study of Magic and Religion]. (Eksmo, Moscow, 2006, 690 p.). [in Russian].

Truspekova Kh.Kh. Istoki i khudozhestvennyye traditsii formoobrazovaniya bytovykh izdeliy v kazakhskom narodnom iskusstve: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskaniye uchenoy stepeni kandidata iskusstvovedeniya [The origins and artistic traditions of the shaping of household products in Kazakh folk art. Dissertation abstract for the degree of candidate of art history]. Protected: 05.04.87. Moscow, 1987, 26 p. [in Russian].

Qara öleñ [Black (Folk) songs]. (Zhazushy, Almatı, 1989, 320 p.). [in Kazakh].

Semenova T.S. Narodnoye iskusstvo i yego problemy (ocherki) [Folk art and its problems (essays)]. (Sovetskiy khudozhnik, Moscow, 1977, 247 p.). [in Russian].

Assman Ya. Kul’turnaya pamyat’: Pis’mo, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti [Cultural memory: Writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity]. (Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury, Moscow, 2004, 368 p.). [in Russian].

Gerchuk Yu.Ya. Chto takoye ornament? Struktura i smysl ornamental’nogo obraza [What is an ornament? The structure and meaning of the ornamental image]. (Galart, Moscow, 1998, 328 p.). [in Russian].

Bobrinskiy A.A. O nekotorykh simvolicheskikh znakakh, obshchikh pervobytnoy ornamentike vsekh narodov Yevropy i Azii [About some symbolic signs common to the primitive ornamentation of all the peoples of Europe and Asia].. (Trudy Yaroslavskogo oblastnogo s»yezda, Moscow, 1902, P. 65–75). [in Russian].

Khogart U. Analiz krasoty [Analysis of beauty]. (Iskusstvo, Moscow, 1987, 284 p.). [in Russian].

Zedlmayr G. Iskusstvo i istina: Teoriya i metod istorii iskusstva [Art and Truth: Theory and Method of Art History.]. (Achíōma, St. Petersburg, 2000, 272 p.). [in Russian].

Kollingvud R. Printsipy iskusstva [Principles of Art]. («Yazyki russkoy kul’tury», Moscow, 1999, 328 p.). [in Russian].

Bernshteyn B. M. Traditsiya i kanon. Dva paradoksa [Tradition and Canon. Two paradoxes]. Kriterii i suzhdeniya v iskusstvoznanii [Criteria and judgments in art history]. (Sovetskiy khudozhnik, Moscow, 1986, P. 176-214). [in Russian].

Polosmak N.V., Barkova L.L. Kostyum i tekstil’ pazyryktsev Altaya (IV–III vv. do n. e.) [Costume and textiles of the Altai Pazyryk people (IV-III centuries bc)]. (INFOLIO, Novosibirsk 2005, 232 p.). [in Russian].

Nurlanova K. Chelovek i mir: Kazakhskaya natsional’naya ideya [Man and the world: Kazakh national idea]. (Karzhy-karazhat, Almaty, 1994, 48 p.). [in Russian].

Gumilev L.N. Iskusstvo i etnos. Postanovka problemy [Art and ethnos. Statement of the problem]. Dekorativnoye iskusstvo [Decorative art]. 1, P. 36–41 (1972). [in Russian].

Жүктеулер

Жарияланды

2021-11-26

Дәйексөзді қалай келтіруге болады

Suraganov, . S. (2021). The leading ornamental motif koshkar muyiz in Kazakh ornamentation: in search of the primordi. Turkic Studies Journal, 3(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2021-2-99-110

Журналдың саны

Бөлім

МАҚАЛАЛАР