Turkology: scientific paradigm and intersubject description
Views: 320 / PDF downloads: 147
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/tsj.02-2019/2-5Keywords:
Turkology; humanities; scientific paradigm; platform; linguistics; folklore; anthropology; ethnography; complex disciplines; interdisciplinary; historical comparative studies; historical and social; pragmatics; typology; poeticsAbstract
The article analyzes the relationship and the complex (complex) nature of the humanities,
which are part of Turkology. For this purpose, the scientific materials of Turkology and
their historical transitions were studied on the basis of linguistics and folklore. As a result, the
scientific paradigms of the disciplines of Turkic languages and folklore were developed in collaboration
with each other. The coincidence was observed on the theoretical and methodological
basis of research, and not only on the political and social situation, the general historical era.
Three periods of development, such as the Radlov period of linguistics, the policy of the linguistic
development of the Soviet era (linguistic construction) and the study of the historical-comparative
aspect of world scientific experience, were repeatedly duplicated in folklore. The reason for this
is that folklore was interpreted as some kind of verbal expression of a language phenomenon. The
development of world anthropological science has shown that these two subjects will develop in
the future.
Downloads
Reference
Shiraliyev M. (2008) Fundamentals of Azerbaijani dialectology. Baku, East-West. 416 p.
Hajiyev T. (2012) History of the literary language of Azerbaijan. I. Baku, Science. 501 p.
Mahmud Kashghari. (2006) Divani-Dictionary. II. Baku, Ozan (translated and published by Ramiz Asker). 762 p.
Kazimov I. (2014) Mahmud Kashghari “Divani and Modern Turkic Languages”. Science and Education. Baku. 224 p.
Reformitsky A. (1955) Introduction to language. Moscow. 410 p.
Shaimerdinova N. (2019) Kirghiz-Russian Slovenian (1987): Cultures and Explosives. Turkic Studies Journal No 1, Vol.1. Nur-Sultan. P. 73-88.
Afanasev V.Q. (1972) Fundamentals of Philosophical Knowledge. Baku. 401 p.
Kurbanov A. (2004) General Linguistics. Volume II. Baku.
(1973) Objective linguistic method.Moscow, Nauka [Science]. 301 p.
Kazimov I. (2010) Comparative Vocabulary of Contemporary Turkic Languages. Baku. 400 p.
Xeyriyya S.Y. (1996) Throughout history Slavic - Turkic language relations. Baku. 202 p.
(1962) Modern Kazakh language. Phonetics and morphology. Alma-Ata, Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR. 380 p.
Bazarov O. (1883) Parts in Uzbek language. KD. Moscow. P. 21.
Shiraliev M.Sh. (1972) Mahmood Kashgari, Dialectologist. Sov.Turkology, No.1. P. 24-30.
Shiraliev M.Sh. (1983) Dialects and colors of the Azerbaijani language. Edited by Sherba. Baku, Science. 160 p.
SherbaA.M. (1970) Comperative phonetics of the Turkic languages. Leningrad, Nauka [Science].
Shiraliev M.Sh. (1982) The Azerbaijani language in modern times. No. 6. Turkology. P. 39-43.
Nazarova M., (1999) Mammadaga Shiraliyev and Problems of Azerbaijani Turkology. Baku, Science. 119 p.
Dialectological Atlas of the Azerbaijani Language. Introduction. By M.I. Isxakov
Shiraliev M.Sh. (1963) The problem of the language and the dialect. The dialectology of the Turkish languages. Baku.
Shiraliev M.Sh. (1960) «The etymological form of - iban ,ibyan « - the Language. No. 3. P. 38-41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Turkic Studies Journals
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
