Семипоколенная экзогамная структура «Жетіата» как община-социум* (к проблеме совпадения рода и общины у казахов-кочевников)

Алимбай Нурсан

doi:10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-4-7-26

Авторы

Алимбай Нурсан Центральный государственный музей Республики Казахстан

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-4-7-26

Ключевые слова:

кочевая община, семпоколенная экзогамная структура – «жетіата», «бірата», патрономия, общественные отношения, родовая территория, логика, структура, организационная форма, функция

Аннотация

Этнически характерной организационной формой общинных отношений у казахов-кочевников
был род – так называемая семипоколенная экзогамная структура «жетіата», объединившая группу кровных род-
ственников в пределах семи поколений по отцовской линии и синтезировавшая в себе практически все типы и
уровни социальных отношений в кочевой среде. Ее известная демографическая ограниченность во времени и про-
странстве и территориальная локализованность, а также отграниченность от подобных структур обеспечивались
экзогамным барьером семейно-брачных отношений. Подобная локализованность, а также относительный авто-
номный режим функционирования данной структуры получили мощное идеологическое и историографическое
обоснование в генеологической традиции – «шежіре» и обусловлены социально-экономическими, природно-эко-
логическими и институциональными факторами.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Биография автора

Алимбай Нурсан, Центральный государственный музей Республики Казахстан

кандидат исторических наук, директор

Литература

Alіmbay N. Ru [Relative], Qazaqtyn etnografiyalyq kategoriyalar, ugymdar men ataularynyn dasturlі zhujesі. Enciklopediya [Traditional system of ethnographic categories, concepts and names of Kazakhs. Encyclopedia]. Almaty, TOO «Alem Damu Integraciya», 5, 2017. 816 p. [in Kazakh].

Kovalevskiy M.M. Rodovoj byt v nastoyashchem, nedavnem i otdalennom proshlom: opyt v oblasti sravnitel’noj etnografii i istorii prava [Generic life in the present, recent and distant past: experience in the field of comparative ethnography and history of law]. Saint-Petrsburg, Tip. Akcioner. o-va Brokgauz-Efron, 1911. 312 p. [in Russian].

Bat’yanova E.I. Rod i obshchina u teleutov v XIX – nachale XXI veka [Family and community of teleuts in the XIX-early XXI century]. Moscow, Nauka, 2007. 395 p. [in Russian].

Korotaev A.V., Obolonkov A.A. Rod kak forma social’noj organizacii v rabotah dorevolyucionnyh russkih i sovetskih issledovatelej [Relative as a form of social organization in the works of pre-revolutionary russian and soviet researchers]. In: Uzlovye problemy istorii dokapitalisticheskih obshchestv Vostoka. Voprosy istoriografii [Nodal problems of the history of pre-capitalist societies of the East. Questions of historiography]. Moscow, Nauka, 1990. P. 3-52. [in Russian].

Vostrov V.V., Mukanov M.S. Rodoplemennoj sostav i rasselenie kazahov (konec XIX – nachalo XX v.) [Tribal composition and settlement of Kazakhs (late XIX-early XX c.)]. Alma-Ata, Nauka, 1968. 255 p. [in Russian].

Mukanov M.S. Etnicheskij sostav i rasselenie kazahov Srednego zhuza [Ethnic composition and settlement of the kazakhs of the middle zhuz]. Alma-Ata, Nauka, 1974. 204 p. [in Russian].

Hillery G.A. Deginitions of Community: Ageas of Agreement, Rugal Sociology. Vol. 20 (2), 1955. P. 119.

Terner V. Simvol i ritual [Symbol and ritual]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983. 277 p. [in Russian].

Alimbay N. Obshchina kak social’nyj mekhanizm zhizneobespecheniya v kochevoj etnoekosisteme [Community as a social mechanism of life support in the nomadic ethno-ecosystem]. In: Alimbay N., Mukanov M.S., Argynbaev Kh. Tradicionnaya kul’tura zhizneobespecheniya kazahov. Ocherki teorii i istorii [Traditional culture of life support of kazakhs. Essays on theory and history]. (Nauka, Almaty, 1998, P. 10-61). [in Russian].

Kryukov M.V. O sootnoshenii rodovoj i patronomicheskoj (klanovoj) organizacij (k postanovke voprosa) [About the ratio of generic and metronomically (clan) organizations (to question statement)]. In: Sovetskaya etnografiya [Soviet Ethnography]. (1967, 6, P. 83-94). [in Russian].

Ol’derogge D.A. Ierarhiya rodovyh struktur i tipy bol’shesemejnyh domashnih obshchin[Hierarchy of generic structures and types of large-family home communities]. In: Social’naya organizaciya narodov Azii i Afriki [Social organization of Asian and African peoples]. (Nauka, Moscow, 1975, P. 6-19). [in Russian].

Obshchina v Afrike. Problemy tipologii [Community in Africa. Problems of typology]. Redkol.: S.A. Tokarev (otv. red.), Yu.M. Kobishchanov. AN SSSR. In-t Afriki [Ed.: S.A.Tokarev (ed.), Yu.M. Kobishchanov. USSR Academy of Sciences. In-t of Africa]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978. 291 p. [in Russian].

Danilova L.V., Danilov V.P. Problemy teorii i istorii obshchiny [Problems of theory and history of the community]. Obshchina v Afrike. Problemy tipologii [Community in Africa. The problem of typology]. (Moscow, 1978, P. 9-60). [in Russian].

Syumov Yu.S. Obsuzhdenie teoreticheskih problem obshchiny (XIV Mezhrespublikanskij simpozium po agrarnoj istorii Vostochnoj Evropy). NAA [Discussion of theoretical problems of the community (XIV inter-Republican Symposium on agricultural history of Eastern Europe). NAA]. (1973, 6, P. 225-226). [in Russian].

Pershic A.I. Problemy tipologizacii obshchiny v dorevolyucionnoj russkoj i sovetskoj etnografii [Problems of community typology in pre-revolutionary russian and soviet ethnography]. Ocherk istorii russkoj etnografii, fol’kloristiki i antropologii [Essay on the history of russian ethnography, folklore and anthropology]. (Nauka, Moscow, 1978, VІІI, P. 142-156). [in Russian].

Social’naya organizaciya narodov Azii i Afriki [Social organization of the peoples of Asia and Africa]. Moscow, Nauka, 1975. 315 p. [in Russian].

Izuchenie istorii Afriki: Problemy i dostizheniya [Studying the history of Africa: Problems and achievements]. Otv. red. B.B. Piotrovskij, B. M. Tupolev [Ed. by B.B.Piotrovsky, B.M.Tupolev]. Moscow, Nauka, 1985. 303 p. [in Russian].

Tolybekov S.E. Kochevoe obshchestvo kazahov v XVІІ – nachale XX veka. Politiko-ekonomicheskij analiz [Nomadic society of kazakhs in the XVII-early XX century. Political and economic analysis]. Alma-Ata, Nauka, 1971. 632 p. [in Russian].

Shahmatov V.F. Kazahskaya pastbishchno-kochevaya obshchina [Kazakh pastoral and nomadic community]. Alma-Ata, Tipografiya izdatel’stva AN KazSSR, 1964. 207 p. [in Russian].

Kurylev V.P. Skot, zemlya, obshchina u kochevyh i polukochevyh kazahov (vtoraya polovina XІX – nachalo XX veka) [Cattle, land, community of nomadic and semi-nomadic kazakhs (second half of the XIX – early XX century)]. In: V. P. Kurylev. Ros. akad. nauk, Muzej antropologii i etnografii im. Petra Velikogo (Kunstkamera) [Russian Academy of Sciences, Museum of anthropology and Ethnography. The Great Peter (Kunstkamera)]. Saint-Petersburg, MAE, 1998. 287 p. [in Russian].

Rumyancev P.P. Kirgizskij narod v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Kyrgyz people in the past and present]. sost. P.P. Rumyancev; Pereselench. upr. Gl. upr. zemleustrojstva i zemledeliya [comp. P.P. Rumyantsev; Migration management. Main department of land management and agriculture]. Saint-Petersburg, Pereselench. upr. G.U.Z. i Z., 1910. 66 p. [in Russian].

Masanov N.E. Kochevaya civilizaciya kazahov (osnovy zhiznedeyatel’nosti nomadnogo obshchestva) [Nomadic civilization of the Kazakhs (fundamentals of nomadic society)]. Almaty, «Socinvest», Moscow, «Gorizont», 1995. 320 p. [in Russian].

Sledzevskij I.V. Zemledel’cheskaya obshchina v Zapadnoj Afrike: hozyajstvennaya i social’naya struktura. Voprosy teorii. Postanovka problemy [Farming community in West Africa: economic and social structure. Questions of theory. Problem statement]. In: Obshchina v Afrike. Problemy tipologii [Community in Africa. The problem of typology]. (Nauka, Moscow, 1978, P. 61-132). [in Russian].

Kaufman A.A. Kochevniki // Kaufman A.A. Russkaya obshchina v processe ee zarozhdeniya i rosta [The Russian community in the process of its birth and growth]. (Tipografiya Tovarishchestva I.D. Sytina, Moscow, 1908, P. 1-216). [in Russian].

Rumyancev P.P. Social’noe stroenie kirgizskogo naroda v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Social structure of the Kyrgyz people in the past and present]. (Saint-Petersburg, 1909(5), P. 79-137). [in Russian].

Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol’zovaniyu, sobrannye i razrabotannye ekspediciej po issledovaniyu stepnyh oblastej [Materials on Kirghiz land use, collected and developed by the expedition for the study of the steppe regions]. T. I. Akmolinskaya oblast’. Kokchetavskij uezd. Voronezh, 1898, 1041 p.; T. II. Akmolinskaya oblast’. Atbasarskij uezd. Voronezh, 1902, IV+XXXIV+494 p.; T. III. Akmolinskaya oblast’. Akmolinskij uezd. Part I. Poaul’nyya tablicy. Saint-Petersburg, 1907, 67+IV+523+141 p.; Part 2. Chernigov, 1909, 153+29 (65–93) p.; T. IV. Semipalatinskaya oblast’. Pavlodarskij uezd. Voronezh, 1903, VII+90+III+662 p.; T. V. Turgajskaya oblast’. Kustanajskij uezd. Voronezh, 1903, V+154+III+375 p.; T. IV. Semipalatinskaya oblast’. Karkaralinskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1905, 90+IV+827+134 p.; T. VII. Turgajskaya oblast’. Aktyubinskij uezd. Voronezh, 1903, V+570 p.; T. VIII. Semipalatinskaya oblast’. Zajsanskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1909, VIII+695 p.; T. IX. Semipalatinskaya oblast’. Ust’-Kamenogorskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1905, III+82+99+80+IV+369 p.; T. X. Semipalatinskaya oblast’. Semipalatinskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1909, IX+795 p.; T. XI. Akmolinskaya oblast’. Omskij uezd. Chernigov, 1908, VII+593 p.; T. XIII. Svodka materialov po kirgizskomu zemlepol’zovaniyu. Saint-Petersburg, 1906, XI+322 p. [in Russian].

Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol’zovaniyu v Syrdar’inskoj oblasti [Materials on Kyrgyz land use in the Syrdarya region]. I. Chimkentskij uezd. Tashkent, 1908, IV+639 p.; II. Chimkentskij uezd. Tashkent, 1910, 277 p.; Aulieatinskij uezd. Tashkent, 1911, 699 p.; Perovskij uezd. Tashkent, 1912, 640 p.; Kazalinskij uezd. Tashkent, 1913, 386 p. [in Russian].

Materialy po kirgizskomu zemlepol’zovaniyu, sobrannye i razrabotannye Statisticheskoj partiej Turgajsko-Ural’skogo pereselencheskogo rajona [Materials on Kyrgyz land use collected and developed by the Statistical party of the Turgay-Ural resettlement district]. Turgajskij uezd. Orenburg, 1911, 283 p.; Irgizskij uezd. Orenburg, 1913; Kustanajskij uezd. Orenburg, 1912; Lbishchenskij uezd. Orenburg, 1914; Aktyubinskij uezd. Orenburg, 1912. [in Russian].

Materialy po obsledovaniyu tuzemnogo i russkogo starozhil’cheskogo hozyajstva i zemlepol’zovaniya v Semirechenskoj oblasti [Materials on the survey of native and russian old-timers and land use in the Semirechensk region]. T. I. Lepsinskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1911, 11+401+633 p.; T. II. Kapal’skij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1913, X+249+529 p.; T. III. Dzharkenskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1913, IX+321+439 p. [in Russian].

Materialy po povtornomu obsledovaniyu v 1910-1911 gg. hozyajstva i zemlepol’zovaniya kirgiz Semipalatinskoj oblasti [Materials on repeated survey of economy and land use in 1910-1911 of the Kyrgyz Republic of Semipalatinsk region]. T.1. Pavlodarskij uezd. Semipalatinsk, 1912. VI+753 s.; T. II. Ust’-Kamenogorskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1913, V+788 p.; T. III. Zajsanskij uezd. Saint-Petersburg, 1913, 589 p. [in Russian].

Alimbai N. Ob iskhodnyh principah izucheniya tradicionnogo kazahskogo obshchestva (kratkij nomadologicheskij diskurs) [On the basic principles of studying traditional kazakh society (short nomadological discourse). Trudy Central’nogo muzeya [Proceedings of the Central Museum]. (Nauka, Almaty, 2004, I, P. 137-160). [in Russian].

Alimbai N. Eshche raz o kochevoj obshchine kak osnovnoj organizacionnoj forme tradicionnyh social’nyh otnoshenij u kazahov [Once again about the nomadic community as the main organizational form of traditional social relations among the Kazakhs]. In: Vklad kochevnikov v razvitie mirovoj civilizacii. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [The Contribution of nomads to the development of world civilization. Proceedings of the international scientific conference]. Almaty, 21-23.11.2007. Almaty, Dajk-Press, 2008, P. 208-221. [in Russian].

Alimbai N. Community as a principle organizational form of social relations of nomads. In: Eleink. (Magyar Őstőrténet, 2009, VIII, Évfolyam, 1. Szam (15.), P. 28-35). [in Russian].

Alimbai N. Evrazijskoe kochevnichestvo kak obshchinnyj tip social’nosti (Vvedeniya v problematiku) [Eurasian nomadism as a communal type of sociality (Introduction to problems)]. In: Urbanizaciya i nomadizm v Central’noj Azii: istoriya i problemy. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii [Urbanization and nomadism in Central Asia: history and problems. Proceedings of the international conference]. (Dajk-press, Almaty, 2004, P. 185-193). [in Russian].

Alimbai N. Semipokolennaya ekzogamnaya struktura «zhetіata» kak obshchina-socium (k probleme sovpadeniya roda i obshchiny u kazahov-kochevnikov) [Seven-generation exogamous structure of «zhetiata» as a community-society (on the problem of matching the genus and community of Kazakh nomads)]. In: Istoricheskij ezhegodnik (trudy uchenyh Instituta istorii i etnologii imeni CH.CH. Valihanova) [Historical yearbook (works of scientists of the Institute of history and Ethnology named after Ch. Ualikhanov)]. (Er Zhanіbek, Almaty, 2019, P. 99-116). [in Russian].

Alimbai N. La comunita come prinsipale forma organizzativa delle relazioni sociali dei nomadi: note preliminari. In: Popoli dellaYurta Kazakhstan: tra le origini e la modernita. (Jaca Book, Milano, 2008, P. 99-110). [in Italian].

Kroeber A.L. Anthropology. NewYork, 1948, 325 p.

Levi-Stros K. Strukturnaya antropologiya. Perevod s francuzskogo. Izd. 2-oe [Structural anthropology. Translated from the French. Ed.2]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt, 2008. 554 p. [in Russian].

Parsons T. O strukture social’nogo dejstviya. Perevod s anglijskogo [On the structure of social action. Translated from English]. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt, 2000. 880 p. [in Russian].

Markar’yan E.S. Teoriya kul’tury i sovremennaya nauka (logiko-metodologicheskij analiz) [Theory of culture and modern science (logical and methodological analysis)]. Moscow, Mysl’, 1983. 284 p. [in Russian].

Marks K. Formy, predshestvuyushchie kapitalisticheskomu proizvodstvu [Forms preceding capitalist production]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1968, T.46, Part I. 472 p. [in Russian].

Korotaev A.V. «Apologiya trajbalizma»: plemya kak forma social’no-politicheskoj organizacii slozhnyh nepervobytnyh obshchestv (po materialam Severo-Vostochnogo Jemena) [«Apology of tribalism»: the tribe as a form of socio-political organization of complex non-primitive societies (based on materials from North-Eastern Yemen)]. In: Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal]. (1995, 4, P. 68-86). [in Russian].

Dzheri D., Dzheri Dzh. Bol’shoj tolkovyj sociologicheskij slovar’. Perevod s anglijskogo. V 2-h tomah [The big explanatory sociological dictionary]. Translated from English. In 2 volumes]. Moscow, «Veche», 2001, T. I. 544 p. [in Russian].

Dzheri D., Dzheri Dzh. Bol’shoj tolkovyj sociologicheskij slovar’. Perevod s anglijskogo. V 2-h tomah [The big explanatory sociological dictionary. Translated from English. In 2 volumes]. Moscow, «Veche», 2001, T. II. 528 p. [in Russian].

Al’tyusser L. Za Marksa. Perevod s francuzskogo [For Marx. Translated from French]. Mocow, Praksis, 2006. 390 p. [in Russian].

Lefort K. Formy istorii. Ocherki politicheskoj antropologii. Perevod s francuzskogo [Forms of history. Essays in political anthropology. Translated from the French]. Saint-Petersburg, «Nauka», 2007. 340 p. [in Russian].