Symbolic diplomacy of place and space in Eurasia: “multi-vector” vs. “third neighbor” policies-impact of nomadic features on foreign policy strategies of Kazakhstan and Mongolia

Алиси Кампи

doi:10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-53

Авторы

Алиси Кампи Индианский университет

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-53

Ключевые слова:

Казахстан, Монголия, многовекторность, «третий сосед», кочевое насле- дие, трехсторонний подход.

Аннотация

В данной статье рассматривается современная дипломатическая политика
Казахстана и Монголии, которые являются двумя не имеющими выхода к морю евразийскими
государствами, имеющими общее кочевое и советское наследие. Оба используют символику места и
пространства в качестве перекрестков между трансконтинентальными подгруппами для содействия
экономическому развитию на континенте, где доминируют соседи-сверхдержавы, Китай и Россия.
Две страны в демократическую эпоху после распада Советского Союза разработали стратегии
«многовекторности» и «третьего соседа», основанные на их историческом кочевом опыте, чтобы
вырваться из своих географических ограничений, не имеющих выхода к морю.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Биография автора

Алиси Кампи, Индианский университет

доктор философии, вице-президент монгольского
общества Арлингтон

Литература

MacKay J., Levin J., Carvalho G., Cavoukian K., Cuthbert R. Before and After Borders: The Nomadic Challenge to Sovereign Territoriality. International Politics. (2014, P. 1-23.).

Campi A. Mongolia’s Foreign Policy: Navigating a Changing World. PH, Lynne Reiner. Boul-der, CO. (2019).

Campi A. Policies Through Which Central Eurasian Nations Are Promoting Their Civilizational Experiences: An Exercise in ‘Soft Power’ and Global Image Making. Comparative Civilizations Review, 79, 47-75, 2018.

Campi A. Problems Integrating Mongolia’s Nomads into a 21st Century Nationstate. Paper given at International Conference Dialogue Between Cultures and Civilizations: Present State and Perspectives of Nomadism in a Globalizing World. (Ulaanbaatar, 2004).

Campi A. Mongolia as a Bridge to Central Asia. Journal of Mongolian Studies of the Mongolian and Tibetan Commission. (2003).

Campi A. Moving Mongolian Nomadism into the 21st Century: Cultural and Ecological Pres-ervation Coupled with Economic Vitality and National Security. Mongolica. International Association for Mongol Studies. 9(30). (Ulaanbaatar, 1999).

Campi A. The Special Cultural and Sociological Challenges Involved in Modernizing Mongo-lia’s Nomadic Socialist Economy. Opuscula Altaica. (1994, P. 212-249.).

Orhon M. Imaginary Nomads: Deconstructing the Representation of Mongolia as a Land of No-mads. Inner Asia. 13(2). (2011, P. 335-362.).

Sabloff P. L. W. ed. Modern Mongolia: Reclaiming Genghis Khan. (PH, University of Pennsyl-vania Museum Publications, Philadelphia, 2001).

Watterson S. (3.6.2014) Jinkhin Mongol/True Mongolian: Mongolian museums and the con-struction of national .identity. Australia: Ph.D. dissertation at Deakin University. Available at: http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30067476/watterson-jinkin-2014A.pdf. August 20.8.2020.

Batsaikhan O. Mongolchuudyn Үndestenij Oj Sanamzhaa Sergeekhkhemeesen Oroldlogo (XX zuuny ekhen үe) [Recovery of the Historical Memory of the Mongolian People as a Basis for the Strength-ening of National Identity-from the beginning of the 20th century], [Mongol tuurgatny ert ba edүgee, Olon ulsyn erdem shinzhilgeenij tavdugaar chuulgan Mongol Tuurgatny soyol erdem shinzhilgeenij san [Paper for 5th International Conference ‘Past and present of the Mongolic peoples’]. 24-26.8.2017. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. P.1-16. [in Mongolian].

Kingsley P. Nomads no more: why Mongolian herders are moving to the city. The Guardian. 5.1.2017. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/05/mongolian-herders-moving-to-city-climate-change (Accessed: 21.8.2020).

Reyes H. Nomads in Transition. The Diplomat. 16.10.2014. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2014/10/mongolia-nomads-in-transition/ (Accessed: 20.8.2020).

On Nomad Culture and Its Contribution. 1.10.2018. Available at: https://e-history.kz/en/publi-cations/view/on_nomad_culture_and_its_contribution__4514© e-history.kz (Accessed: 19.8.2020).

Isaacs R. Nomads, warriors and bureaucrats: nation-building and film in post-Soviet Kazakh-stan. Nationalities Papers-The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 43(3), 399-416 (2015).

Burkhanov A. Multiculturalism and Nation‐Building in Kazakhstan: Trends in Media Discourse, State Policy, and Popular Perceptions. The Muslim World. 10(l). 2020. P. 24-39. Available at: https://re-search.nu.edu.kz/en/publications/multiculturalism-and-nation-building-in-kazakhstan-trends-in-medi-2. (Accessed: 21.8.2020).

Kamrava M. Nation‐Building in Central Asia: Institutions, Politics, and Culture. The Muslim World. 110(1). December, 6-23 (2020).

Atai F. Post-Soviet Art and Culture in Central Asia. Anthropology of East Europe Review, Special Issue: Out of the Ruins: Cultural Negotiations in the Soviet Aftermath, 16(2), 107-124 (1999).

Ferret C. The Ambiguities of the Kazakhs’ Nomadic Heritage. Nomadic Peoples, 20 (2), 176-199 (2016).

Nazar N.A. ‘Mangilik El’- The Symbol Of Unity. Qazaqstan Tarihy. 12.10.2016. Available at: https://e-history.kz/en/news/show/6925/ (Accessed: 5.8.2020).

Nysanbaeb A., Mashan M., Murzalin J., Tuleugulov A. Evolution politicheskii sistemy Ka-zakhstan Evolution of the political system of Kazakhstan. (Almaty, 2001). [in Kazakh]. Cited in Sagatova A.S. and Abdrahmanova A.A. About the role of the national idea «Mangilik El», as a strategy for the development of Kazakhstan in the context of globalization. (Bulletin of the Karaganda University, 2019). Available at: https://articlekz.com/en/article/29663 (Accessed: 6.8.2020).

Nazarbayev N. Nobyi Kazakhstan b nobom mire: Poslanie Prezidenta RK Prezidenta N. Nazarbaeva narodu Kazakhstan. (New Kazakhstan in the New World: Message from the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan N. Nazarbayev to the people of Kazakhstan, Astana, 2007). [in Kazakh].

Clarke M. Kazakhstan’s Multi-vector Foreign Policy: Diminishing Returns in an Era of Great Power “Pivots”?, National Security College, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National Uni-versity Special Forum. April 09, 2015 . Available at: http://www.theasanforum.org/kazakhstans-multi-vec-tor-foreign-policy-diminishing-returns-in-an-era-of-great-power-pivots/ (Accessed: 20.8.2020).

Cull N.J. The Quest for Reputational Security: The Soft Power Agenda of Kazakhstan. Soft Power. 30(1.11.2018). Available at: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/quest-reputational-securi-ty-soft-power-agenda-kazakhstan (Accessed: 8.21.2020).

Kassen M. Understanding foreign policy strategies of Kazakhstan: a case study of the land-locked and transcontinental country. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 31(3-4). P. 314-343 (2018).

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Facts about Desertification. (30.9.2009) Available at: http://www.greenmongolia.mn/en/about-codep/facts-about-desertification.html (Accessed: 3.1.2019).

Mostafa G. The Concept of ‘Eurasia’: Kazakhstan’s Eurasian policy and its implications. Jour-nal of Eurasian Studies. July, 4 (2). P. 160-170 (2013).

Sagatova A.S. and Abdrahmanova A.A. About the role of the national idea «Mangilik El», as a strategy for the development of Kazakhstan in the context of globalization. (Bulletin of the Karaganda University, 2019). Available at: https://articlekz.com/en/article/29663 (Accessed: 6.8.2020).

Batchimeg M. National Security of Mongolia: Past, Present, and Future. Mongolian Journal of International Affairs (17), Ulaanbaatar, 2013. P. 12-17.

Batbayar T. “Geopolitics and Mongolia’s Search for Post-Soviet Identity”, Journal of Eurasian Geography and Economics, June, 43(4). P. 323–335 (2002).

Ikeda N. Mongolia: Will It Remain a Local Buffer Nation Between China and Russia, or Be-come a Small Yet Global Nation? A New Perspective on the ‘Third Neighbor Policy’. Mongol Messenger. 28.10.2016.

Otgonbayar Y. Mongolia’s Response to Increasing U.S.-China-Russia Rivalry in Asia. East-West Center DC webinar (33:20-34:40). 29.7.2020. Available at: https://vimeo.com/444447211 (Accessed: 20.8.2020).

Campi A. Mongolia’s Place in Northeast Asia’s Renewable Power Grid. Eurasia Daily Moni-tor. Jamestown Foundation. 28.6.2018. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/mongolias-place-in-northeast-asias-renewable-power-grid/ (Accessed: 21.8.2020).

Ganbat D. National Security Concept of Mongolia: Basic Principle. Security Outlook of the Asia Pacific Countries and Its Implications for the Defense Sector. (Tokyo, National Institute for Defense Studies, 2014, P. 91-99.) Available at: http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/joint_research/se-ries11/pdf/09.pdf (Accessed: 21.8.2020).

Morozova I. Y. Socialist Revolutions in Asia. (PH, Routledge, London, 2009).

Battsetseg S. Winning Hearts and Minds: Mongolia’s Soft Power Approaches to Overseas Im-age Building in the Democratic Era, [paper presented at the Asian Continentalism: Furthering Connections Between East and West conference]. May 31–June 2, 2016. Ulaanbaatar. P. 49-56.

Mongolia-Kazakhstan Transportation Joint Committee meeting. Mongol Messenger. 29.3.2019.

Misheel B. Number of students studying in Kazakhstan to be increased. Montsame. 3.3.2019. Available at: https://montsame.mn/en/read/183481 (Accessed: 27.2.2019).

Campi A. Globalization’s impact on Mongolian identity issues and the image of Chinggis Khan, Mongolian culture and society in the age of globalization: proceedings of an international research conference, Western Washington University, August 5-6, 2005. Studies on East Asia. 26(2006). P. 67-99.

Enkhbayar N. Address of President Enkhbayar. Nomadic, Newsletter of the International Insti-tute for the Study of Nomadic Civilisations. 68(2006). P. 1-3.

Minasyan S. Multi-Vectorism in the Foreign Policy of Post-Soviet Eurasian States. Demokrati-zatsiya. 2012. P. 268-273. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ba20/a903d648651ec4168ae55c-c5f346d019d5cc.pdf (Accessed: 6.8.2020).

Sadykova N. The instrumentalization of ‘Eurasian’ political myth in Kazakstan. 2017. [MA Thesis, Budapest, Hungary]. Available at: http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2017/sadykova_nazerke.pdf (Accessed: 3.3.2019).

Vinokurov E. and Libman A. Eurasian Integration: Challenges of Transcontinental Regional-ism. (PH, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2012).