Алтын Орданың мемлекеттік идеологиясы

Satay Syzdykov

doi:10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-69

Authors

Satay Syzdykov Eurasian National University named after L.N.Gumilyov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-69

Keywords:

Golden Оrda, “Mangilik El”, ideology, the state, тurks

Abstract

In general, in the era of the Golden Horde, the name of the idea «Mangilik El» was
officially used as «Power of the Eternal Tengri». The texts in the press of Khan Kuyuk, in the letter of Khan
Argun, written to the address of the French king Philip, and in the documents confirming the authority
of the ambassador of the Khan of the Golden Horde Uzbek, began with the words «Power of the Eternal
Tengri». Here V. Bartold’s conclusion that the word «Mongol» was first used in the name of his state under
Genghis Khan and only later turned into the name of the people from a scientific point of view is correct.
The word «Mongol» under Genghis Khan was used not as an ethnonym, but as a political name and served
as the ideology of the empire, or the state ideology. This ideology was not invented anew, it became the
ideology of the empire of Genghis Khan by adopting the state ideology of the Turkic Khaganate «Mangilik
El», formed on the basis of the Turkic worldview. And the term «Mongol» also came from the name of the
ideology «Mangilik El».

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Satay Syzdykov, Eurasian National University named after L.N.Gumilyov

doctor of historical sciences, professor, Director of Research Center for interethnic
relations and tolerance of the Assembly of People of Kazakhstan»

Reference

Vladimircov B.Yа. Tureckie elementy v mongol’skom yazyke, [Turkish elements in the Mon-golian language], ZVOIRAO. (ХХ(2–3), Moscow-Leningrad, 1911, 162 p.) [in Russian].

Katanov N.F. Pisma iz Sibiri i Vostochnogo Turkestana [Letters from Siberia and East Turkes-tan]. (SPb., 1893, P. 85. 22781. Li Sin’-chuan’, Cza-czi, 2(19), 591 p.) [in Russian].

Bazarova B.Z. Mongolskie letopisi – pamyatniki kul’tury [ Mongolian Chronicles-cultural mon-uments]. (Moscow, 2006, 233 p.) [in Russian].

Spuler B. Die Goldene Horde. Die Mongolen in Ruβland, 1223–1502. 2., erweiterte Auflage. (Wiesbaden, 1965, 317 p.).

Rodoslovie tyurkov [Genealogy of the Turks], Istoriya Kazahstana v persidskih istochnikah. T. IV. Sbornik materialov, otnosyashchihsya k istorii Zolotoj Ordy. Izvlecheniya iz persidskih sochinenij, so-brannye V.G. Tizengauzenom i obrabotannye A.A. Romaskevichem i S.L. Volinym [History of Kazakhstan in Persian sources. T.IV. Collection of materials related to the history of the Golden Horde. Extracts from Persian works collected by V. G. Tiesengausen and processed by A. A. Romaskevich and S. L. Volin. Resp. edited by M. H. Abuseitova. Revised and add. (Almaty, 2006, 421 p.) [in Russian].

Sinor D. Interpreters in Medieval Asia, AASJIOS. (16(1982), 336 p.).

Bosvort K. Musulmanskie dinastii [Muslim dynasties]. (Moscow, 1971, 394 p.) [in Russian].

Sartqozhauly Q. Orhon eskertkіshterіnіn tolyq Atlasy [Full Atlas of Orkhon monuments. Vol 1. (Almaty, «Samga Press», 2019, 376 p.) [in Kazakh].

Erdenebayar S. Monh tengerijn uzel buyuu Monh tengerijn ive, Setgegdel bichih BIIRBEH.MN by Bataka [Save the concept of heaven or eternal heaven/write comment. BIIRBEH.MN by Bataka.]. Available at: http://www.biirbeh.mn/ [in Mongolian].

Dulam S. Mongol domog zujn dur [Dulam S. In accordance with the Mongolian legend. - All articles: press agencies]. (Ulan Bator, Ulsyn hevlelijn gazar, 1989, 197 p.) [in Mongolian].

Li Sin-chuan, Cza-czi. (2(19), 654 p.) [in Russian].

Pelliot P. Les Mongols et la Papaute, str. [22] etPl. II; sm. takzhe recenziyu V. Kotvicha na etu rabotu v “RocznikOrjentalistyczny” [Les Mongols et la Papaute, str. [22] etPl. II; see also V. Kotvich’s review of this work in “RocznikOrjentalistyczny”, vol. 2]. (2(1919-1924), 1925, 278 p.) [in Russian].

Gumilyov L.N. Tysyacheletie vokrug Kaspiya [A Millennium around the Caspian Sea]. («Di-Dik», 1998, 592 p.) [in Russian].

Hara-Davan. Chingis-han kak polkovodec i ego nasledie [Hara-Dawan. Genghis Khan as a General and his legacy]. (Belgrad, 1929, 226 p.) [in Russian].

Mynbaev N. Zh. Obshchetyurkskaya, kazahskaya etnonimiya v pantopohron ii i problemy tipologicheskoj universalii. Avtoref. disser. na soiskanie uch.stepeni d. filol.n [Turkic, Kazakh ethnic terms in Pontoporeia and problems of typological universals. Abstract. dissertations. for the degree of doctor of Philology]. (Almaty, 2010, 24 p.) [in Russian].

Vladimircov B.Ya. Sravnitel’naya grammatika mongolskogo pismennogo yazyka i halhaskogo narechiya [Comparative grammar of the Mongolian written language and the Khalkha dialect]. (Lenin-grad, 1929, 443 p.) [in Russian].

Lessing F.D. Mongolian – Englich dictionary [Mongolian-English dictionary]. (Berkeley and Los-Angeles, 1960, 721 p.).

Clauson G. An Etimological Dictionary of Pre –thirteenth – century Turkish. (Oxford, 1972, 392 p.).

Ramstedt G.J. Kalmukisches Worterbuch. (Helsinki, 1935, 321 p.).

Gumilev L.N. Drevnie tyurki [Ancient turks]. (Moscow, 1993, 536 p.) [in Russian].

Bezertinov N. Tatary, tyurki–potryasateli Vselennoj [Tatars and Turks are the shockers of the Universe], Istoriya velikih imperij [History of the great empires] (Novosibirsk, 2001, 731 p.) [in Russian].

Gilom de Rubruk. Puteshestvie v Vostochnye strany [Journey to the East of the country]. Trans-lated by A. I. Malein (Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo geograficheskoj literatury, 1957, 232 p.) [in Russian].

Bartold V.V. Chingiz han [Chingiz-khan], Soch, (5(1968), 759 p.) [in Russian].