Symbolic diplomacy of place and space in Eurasia: “multi-vector” vs. “third neighbor” policies-impact of nomadic features on foreign policy strategies of Kazakhstan and Mongolia


Views: 70 / PDF downloads: 164

Authors

  • Alicia Campi Indiana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-53

Keywords:

Kazakhstan, Mongolia, multi-vector, Third Neighbor, nomadic heritage, trilateralism

Abstract

This paper examines the present-day diplomatic policies of Kazakhstan and Mongolia,
which are two landlocked Eurasian nations that share a common no madic and Soviet heritage. Both
utilize symbolism of place and space as intersections between transcontinental subgroupings to promote
economic development within a continent dominated by superpower neighbors, China and Russia. The
two nations in the democratic era after the collapse of the Soviet Union have devised “Multi-Vector” and
“Third Neighbor” strategies derived from their historic nomadic experiences to break out of their landlocked
geographical constraints.

Author Biography

Alicia Campi, Indiana University

Ph.D, Vice President, The Mongolia Society Arlington

Downloads

Published

2021-11-26

How to Cite

Campi, A. (2021). Symbolic diplomacy of place and space in Eurasia: “multi-vector” vs. “third neighbor” policies-impact of nomadic features on foreign policy strategies of Kazakhstan and Mongolia. Turkic Studies Journal, 2(3), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2020-2-3-53

Issue

Section

ARTICLES