Language contacts of Azerbaijani and Kazakh turkic languages (on the basis of azerbaijanian dialectologist, academician Mammadaga Shiraliyev’s creative works)

Mahira Huseynova

doi:10.32523/tsj.02-2019/2-4

Authors

Mahira Huseynova Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32523/tsj.02-2019/2-4

Keywords:

integration; phonetic character; researcher; literary language

Abstract

Turkic literary languages or dialects have very long common roots, and despite various
political and geographical differences, these native languages have preserved their ancient
roots, vocabulary, grammatical structure, and phonetic features. Even today, the carriers of these
languages can easily understand each other in a common language. Dialectological studies while
speaking of the phonetic features of Turkish dialects and language varieties traditionally refer to
both vowel and consonant displacements and phonetic laws. The works, monographs and articles
written by scholars of Turkic peoples are also mentioned when we talk about the idea of forming
a common Turkic language in our modern age. M. Shiraliyev correctly points out that on the
one hand our ancient written monuments, works of our writers of the past, and on the other hand
materials of the Turkic languages, help to identify phonetic events and to refine their forms. In
this regard, the works of the great Azerbaijani dialectologist and Turkish scientist, academician
Mammadaga Shirali oglu Shiraliyev are of great importance. The researcher made a number of
words that are typical for the Turkic languages and dialects, giving a comparatively phonetic explanation.
The scientist has researched specific phonetic phenomena and laws in the dialects and
varieties of the Azerbaijani language and has also touched upon the integration of Kazakh language
and dialects when it comes to location. M. Shiraliyev did not exclude the specific features
of the numerous words used in dialects and dialects of the Azerbaijani language, compared with
the literary language and dialects of the Kazakh Turkish, revealed the similarities and differences
with the skills of a true dialectologist. Here, too, there were positive results.It is also clear that
not only Azerbaijani dialectologists, linguists, but also world Turkology scholars have benefited
and will benefit from the work of academician M.Shiraliyev. M.Shiraliyev’s research on the phonetic,
morphological and lexical features of dialects and dialects of the Azerbaijani and Kazakh
languages is still relevant today.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mahira Huseynova, Azerbaijan State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Philological sciences, Prof.,
Dean of the Faculty of Philology

Reference

Kadyrbaev M.K. (1966) Pamyatniki tasmolinskoi kultury // Margulan A.H., Akishev K.A., Kadyrbaev M.K., Orazbaev A.M. Drevnyaya kul’tura Central’nogo Kazahstana [Monuments of the Tasmola culture // Margulan A.Kh., Akishev K.A., Kadyrbayev M.K., Orazbayev A.M. The ancient culture of Central Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata. P. 303-433. [in Russian].

Habdulina M.K. (1994) Stepnoe Priishim’e v epohu rannego zheleza [Steppe Priishimye in the Early Iron Age]. Almaty, Gylym [Science]. 170 p. [in Russian].

Tairov A.D. (2003) Kochevniki Uralo-Irtyshskogo mezhdurech’ya v sisteme kul’tur rannesakskogo vremeni vo-stochnoi chasti stepnoj Evrazii// Stepnaya civilizaciya Vostochnoj Evrazii. T.1. Drevnie epohi [Nomads of the Ural-Irtysh interfluve in the culture system of the Early Saka time of the eastern part of steppe Eurasia// Steppe Civilization of Eastern Eurasia ]. Astana, Kultegin. P. 157-179. [in Russian].

Beisenov A.Z. (2018) Tasmolinskaya kul’tura Centralnogo Kazahstana v issledovaniyah nachala XXI veka // Arheologiya i davnya istoriya Ukraini [Tasmolinskaya culture of Central Kazakhstan in the studies of the beginning of the XXI century// Archeology and early history of Ukraine ]. Vip. 2 (27) [Iss. 2 (27)]. P. 386-396. [in Russian].

Beisenov A.Z., Shulga P.I., Loman V.G. (2017) Poseleniya sakskoi epohi. Monografiya/otv.red. A.Beisenov [The settlement of Saka era. Monography/ the executive editor A.Beisenov]. Almaty, NICIA «Begazy-Tasmola». 208 p. [in Russian].

Kukushkin I.A.. Dmitriev E.A., Kukushkin A.I. (2018) Karazhartas – novyj social’no-stratificirovannyj nekropol’ begazy-dandybaevskoj kul’tury (predvaritel’nye rezul’taty issledovanij) // Arheologicheskie vesti [Karazhartas - a new socially-stratified necropolis of Begaz-Dandybaev culture (preliminary research results) // Archaeological News]. Vyp. 24 [Vol. 24]. SPb [St. Petersburg]. P. 102-109. [in Russian].

Margulan A.H. (1979) Begazy-Dandybaevskaya kultura Centralnogo Kazahstana [Begazy-Dandybay culture of Central Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata. [in Russian].

Parcinger G., Nagler A., Zajbert V., Pleshakov A. (2003) Svyatilishche skifskogo vremeni v Severnom Kazahs-tane // Stepi Evrazii v drevnosti i srednevekov’e: Mater.mezhdunar. nauchnoi konf., posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya M.P. Gryaznova. / Otv. red. YU. Piotrovskii [Sanctuary of the Scythian time in Northern Kazakh-stan // Steppes of Eurasia in antiquity and the Middle Ages: Mater. Mezhdunar. scientific conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the birth of M.P. Gryaznova. / Ans. ed. Yu. Piotrovsky]. SPb [St. Petersburg], Izd-vo Gos.Ermitazha, Kn.II [Publishing House of the State Hermitage, Book II.,]. P. 123-124. [in Russian].

Parcinger G., Zaibert V., Nagler A., Pleshakov A. (2003) Bol’shoi kurgan Baikara. Issledovanie skifskogo svyatil-ishcha [The Great Barrow of Lake Baikar. Study of the Scythian sanctuary]. Berlin. 280 p. [in Russian].

Chugunov K.V. (2011) Arzhan-2: rekonstrukciya etapov funkcionirovaniya pogrebal’no-pominal’nogo komplek-sa i nekotorye voprosy hronologii [Arzhan-2: reconstruction of the stages of the funeral-memorial complex function-ing and some issues of chronology]. Rossiiskii arheologicheskii ezhegodnik, No1 [Russian Archaeological Yearbook, No1]. P. 262-335. [in Russian].

Dzhumabekova G.S., Bazarbaeva G.A. (2019) Narushennye zhenskie pogrebeniya sakskogo vremen v Zhetysu: po materialam mogil’nika Kaspan-6// Margulanovskie chteniya – 2019. Materialy mezhdunar. arheologich. nauch-no-prakticheskoi konferencii, posvyashchennoi 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayushchegosya kazahstanskogo ar-heologa K.A. Akisheva [Violated female burials of the Saka times in Zhetysu: n materials from the Kaspan-6 burial ground// Margulan readings - 2019. Materials of the international archaeological scientific-practical conference dedi-cated to the 95th anniversary of the outstanding Kazakhstan archaeologist K.A. Akishev]. Nur-Sultan, ENU im. L.N. Gumileva [L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University]. P. 260-270. [in Russian].

Borisov A.V., Krivosheev M.V., Mimokhod R.A., Eltsova M.V. (2019) “Sod blocks” in kurgan mounds: Histori-cal and soil features of the technique of tumuli erection. Journal of Archaeological Science, Reports 24. R. 122-131.

Habdulina M.K. (2016) Hramy-svyatilishchasakskoi epohi Severnogo Kazahstana // Religiya i sistema miro-vozrenii drevnih i srednevekovyh nomadov Evrazii [Temples-sanctuaries of the Sakas era of Northern Kazakhstan// Religion and the worldview system of ancient and medieval nomads of Eurasia]. Almaty. P. 137-148. [in Russian].

Chernikov S.S. (1965) Zagadka Zolotogo kurgana: Gde i kogda zarodilos’ skifskoe iskusstvo? [The mystery of the Golden Barrow: Where and when did Scythian art originate ?.]. Moskva [Moscow], Nauka [Science]. 188 p. [in Russian].

Beisenov A.Z. (2017) Tasmolinskaya kul’tura Saryarki// Kazahstan v sakskuyu epohu. Kollektivnaya monografi-ya [The Tasmola culture of Saryarka// Kazakhstan in the Saka era, Collective monograph.]. Almaty, In-t arheologii im. A.H. Margulana [Institute of Archeology named after A.H. Margulan]. P.59-100. [in Russian].

Habdulina M.K. (2019) Pogrebalnyj obryad sakskoi epohi naseleniya stepnoi Saryarki //Mat-ly Mezhdunarodno-go Evraziiskogo foruma «Istoriya Velikoi stepi ot istokov do sovremennosti» [The funeral rite of the Saka era of the population of the steppe Saryarka // Materials of the International Eurasian Forum “History of the Great Steppe from the Sources to the Present.”]. T.2. Nur-Sultan, ENU im. L.N. Gumileva [V.2. - Nur-Sultan: ENU named after L.N. Gumilyov]. P. 302-308. [in Russian].

Nasirdinova A.M. (2018) Arhitekturno-tipologicheskaya klassifikaciya kurgannyh sooruzhenii kochevogo mira [Architectural and typological classification of the mound structures of the nomadic world]. [in Russian]. http: //www.pdffactory.com

Habdulina M.K. (2015) Kamennoe izvayanie sakskogo vremeni iz Centralnogo Kazahstana // Sakskaya kul’tu-ra Saryarki v kontekste izucheniya etnosociokul’turnyh processov Evrazii [Stone sculpture of the Saka time from Central Kazakhstan // Saki culture of Saryarka in the context of the study of ethnosocial and cultural processes of Eurasia]. Almaty, «Begazy-Tasmola». P. 372-375. [in Russian].

Ermolenko L.N. (2018) Kamennye izvayaniya rannego zheleznogo veka v zapadnoi chasti aziatskih stepei// Ocherki pervobytnogo iskusstva Yuzhnoi Sibiri i Central’noi Azii (skifskaya epoha). Koll.monografiya / otv.red. V. Bobrov [Stone sculptures of the Early Iron Age in the western part of the Asian steppes // Essays on the primitive art of South Siberia and Central Asia (Scythian era). Coll.monography / ed. V. Bobrov.]. Kemerovo, Izd-vo KRIPK i PRO [Kemerovo: Publishing house KuzReg ICE and REW,]. P. 105-111. [in Russian].

Akishev K.A. (1969) Zimovki-poseleniya i zhilishcha drevnih usunei [Wintering settlements and dwellings of ancient Usuns]. Izvestiya AN KazSSR, Seriya obshchestv [Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR]. Vyp. 1 [Iss]. P. 29-47. [in Russian].

Bejsenov A.Z. (2017) Zhilishche sakskoi epohi [Dwelling of the Saka era]. Vestnik TomGu. Istoriya. No 45 [Tomsk State University Bulletin, History]. P. 72-82. [in Russian].

Zholdasbaev S. (1976) Tipy osedlyh poselenii Kazakhov po dannym arheologicheskih issledovanii Yuzhnogo i Central’nogo Kazahstana (XV-XIX vv.)// Proshloe Kazahstana po arheologicheskim istochnikam [Types of settled settlements of Kazakhs according to archaeological research of South and Central Kazakhstan (XV-XIX centuries)// The past of Kazakhstan according to archaeological sources]. Alma-Ata, Nauka [Science]. P.46-58. [in Russian].

Bejsenov A.Z. (2017) Krugloe zhilishche sakskoj epohi [The round dwelling of the Saka era]. Samarskij nauchnyj vestnik [Samara Scientific Bulletin]. V.6, No1 (18). P. 94-100. [in Russian].

Habdulina M.K. (2003) Poseleniya rannesakskogo vremeni na r. Selety// Stepnaya civilizaciya Vostochnoj Evra-zii. T. 1. Drevnie epohi [Settlements of the Early Saka time on the river Selety// Steppe Civilization of Eastern Eur-asia. V.1. Ancient era]. Astana, Kultegin. P. 189-199. [in Russian].

Ongar A., Samashev Z., Kiyasbek G., Hasenova B., Mamedov A.M. (2013) Izuchenie okolokurgannogo prostran-stva kurgana No 1 mogil’nika Tortoba (po materialam 2013 g.) // Trudy filiala Instituta arheologii im. A.H. Margulana v g. Astana. Tom P [The study of the near-barrow space of barrow No. 1 of the Tortoba burial ground (based on ma-terials from 2013)]. Astana, Izd-aya gruppa FIA im. A.H. Margulana v g. Astana [publishing group in the transactions of the Institute of Archeology named after A.H. Margulan in the city of Astana]. P. 124-130. [in Russian].

Chugunov K.V. (2015) Formirovanie kul’tur rannih kochevnikov v Kazahstane i Sayano-Altae (k postanovke problemy) // Trudy GosErmitazha: T. 77: Arheologiya bez granic: kollekcii, problemy, issledovaniya, gipotezy [The formation of cultures of early nomads in Kazakhstan and Sayano-Altai (to the formulation of the problem)]. SPb [St. Petersburg], Izd-vo Gos.Ermitazha [Publishing house of the State Hermitage]. P. 457-486. [in Russian].