Caravanserais and the Silk Road system in Azerbaijan: from Medieval trade infrastructure to contemporary geopolitical networks
Views: 24 / PDF downloads: 4
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2026-2-36-53Keywords:
Great Silk Road, Azerbaijani caravanserais, Architectural heritage, Intercultural dialogue, Archaeological heritage, Turkic architecture, Medieval trade routes, Shirvanshah dynasty, Safavid state, TRACECA, Cultural diplomacy, Zangezur CorridorAbstract
This article examines the historical evolution, architectural typology, and geopolitical significance of medieval caravanserais located along the Azerbaijani segment of the Silk Road. Investigating Azerbaijan’s strategic transit position from antiquity to the modern era, the research demonstrates that caravanserais functioned as complex socioeconomic, cultural, and administrative hubs that structured longdistance trade across Eurasia rather than merely as resting stations. This study is based on archaeological evidence, written sources from Islamic geography, numismatic materials, and architectural analyses of surviving monuments. The earliest traces of caravanserai-type structures in Azerbaijan date back to the 6th–3rd millennia BCE. However, this architectural tradition did not reach its peak until the medieval period under Turkic political entities. The article focuses on the interregional roles of the Bukhara and Multani caravanserais in the Icherisheher (Baku’s Old City). These caravanserais served merchants from Central Asia and India, respectively, and their foundations reveal continuity with earlier urban infrastructure. The article analyzes the transit significance of the Sangachal and Garachi (Miachik) complexes along the Caspian coastal route in terms of their architectural characteristics and function within the broader Silk Road landscape. The Maragheh Observatory, founded in the 13th century, is evaluated as a center of intellectual exchange where scholars from China, India, and Syria collaborated. This illustrates the civilizational dimension of the Silk Road, which extended beyond commerce. Additionally, the article explores the architectural similarities between Azerbaijani caravanserais and monuments in Central Asia and Anatolia. Notable examples include Sultan Han in Turkey and Rabat-i Malik in Uzbekistan. These similarities demonstrate the transnational spread of Turkic architectural engineering under the Seljuk, Timurid, and Safavid empires. The article also emphasizes the role of state patronage, particularly that of the Shirvanshahs and Shah Abbas I, in shaping the caravanserai network as an instrument of trade diplomacy. Additionally, the research addresses how the Silk Road routes changed after the geographical discoveries of the late-15th century and the subsequent growth of the Volga–Caspian corridor. In the contemporary context, the study explores the connection between medieval heritage and modern geopolitical realities by examining the TRACECA transport program, the "Virtual Silk Road" initiative, and the strategic importance of the Zangezur Corridor. Ultimately, the article concludes that Azerbaijan’s caravanserai heritage is a universal architectural legacy and living cultural and strategic resource for regional cooperation among Turkic states.
Downloads
Reference
Буниятов З.М., 1984. Государство Атабеков Азербайджана: 1136–1225 гг. Баку: Элм. 271 с.
Кольцов П.М., Кольцова К.П., Эрдни-Горяев Е. Э., 2015. Дорогами Великого Шелкового пути – региональные аспекты. Вестник Калмыцкого университета. № 4 (28). С. 15–22.
Akbulut A., Tuğba H., 2025. “Strabon, Geographika (Coğrafya): Kitap XI.1-14.” LIBRI: Epigrafi, Çeviri ve Eleştiri Dergisi. No 11. S. 425-452. DOI: http://www.libridergi.org/2025/lbr-0343
Alakbarli F., Aliyev İ., 2000. Silk Road: The Origin of the Mulberry Trees. Azerbaijan International Magazine. Vol. 8.3. P. 52-53.
Aliyarli S., 2000. The Great Silk Road and trade between the Caspian and Europe. Visions of Azerbaijan. Vol. 4.1. P. 42-47.
Aşurbəyli S., 2006. Şirvanşahlar dövləti (VI-XVI əsrlər). Bakı: Elm. 416 s.
Atkins M.S., Janz R.F., Kaffenberger W., 2004. The Virtual Silk Highway: a project to bridge the digital divide. Proceedings of the IPSI Conference. Venice. P. 1-8. Available at: https://www2.cs.sfu.ca/~stella/papers/2004/ipsi.pdf (Accessed: 01.03.2026).
Azerbaijan on the Silk Road, 2020. Ed. by S. Mustafayev. Baku: Tahsil Publishing House. 344 p.
Demirel Ş., 2023. Tarihi İpek Yolu: Hindistan ve Azerbaycan Arasındaki Kültürel ve Ticari İletişim. Türkiye-Azerbaycan İlişkilerinin 100. Yılı Özel Sayısı. 10 (2). P. 728-737.
ICOMOS, 2000. Evaluations of cultural properties. World Heritage Committee, 24th session (Cairns, Australia, 2000). WHC.2000/CONF.204/INF.6 + ADD. Paris: ICOMOS. 273 p.
Kroll J.L., 2006. The Han-Xiongnu heqin Treaty (200–135 B.C.) in the Light of Chinese Political and Diplomatic Traditions. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. Vol.78. P. 109–124.
Lobzhanidze G., 2012. Historical-Legislative Aspects of “Silk Road” (TRACECA – Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia). 7th Silk Road International Conference. Tbilisi–Batumi. Georgia. P. 340–342.
Polvonov J., 2021. Caravanserais On The Great Silk Road And Their Archeological Site. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations. 3 (02). P. 80-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume03Issue02-13
Seyidbeyli M., 2021. Azerbaijan on the Great Silk Road between China and Europe (Historical Survey). Global Journals.
Səngəçal karvansarası. Tarixi abidələrimiz. Milli Kimlik Araşdırmaları Portalı, 14.10.2020. Available at: https://millikimlik.az/2020/2281/ (Accessed: 01.03.2026).
Tapdıqoğlu N., 2001. Füzuli rayonunun toponimləri. Bakı: Adiloğlu. 164 s.
UNESCO. Caravanserais: The Cross-roads of Commerce and Culture along the Silk Roads. Silk Road Online Platform. Available at: https://en.unesco.org/silkroad/content/caravanserais-cross-roads-commerce-and-culture-along-silk-roads (Аccessed: 01.03.2026).
Williams T., 2014. The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study. Charenton-le-Pont: ICOMOS. 154 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 M.M. Mустафаев

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

















